Wednesday, 15 May 2019

The Duke of Bedford’s Zoological Exploration of Eastern Asia in the 1900s—3. Who was Dr J.A.C.Smith?

On 15 May I posted a draft of this article. This version (9 June) for reasons explained below is a far more complete account.

The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals could not help me. Oldfield Thomas had named two species in honour of Smith in 1911: Smith’s Shrew, Chodsigoa smithii and Smith’s Zokor, Eospalax smithii, but nothing was known about Dr J.A.C. Smith, the Dr Smith so highly praised for his language skills and handling of difficult situations by Frank Kingdon Ward in On the Road to Tibet. The only clue I had was that in the website on Ward he is described as Jack Smith, a medical missionary. Thanks to the the genealogy sites findmypast.com and ancestry.com, British Newspaper Archive and Google searches, I have been able to find who our Dr Smith was and to bring together most of the varied strands of his life. When I had had nearly completed the first draft I found on the last page of a Google search a digest of articles from 2011 in the Spalding Guardian. That showed I was not the first person to research Smith. Margaret Johnson had written and published privately a book entitled The Life and Travels of Dr J.A.C. Smith. Smith was her late husband’s great-uncle.


I could no find trace of Mrs Johnson’s book in mainstream publishing. I then contacted the three outlets around mentioned in the newspaper article from 2011; they had no copies. I therefore wrote a letter to the editor of the Spalding Guardian, the publication of which brought me an offer of a book and a contact with her family. I am most grateful to Jane Cooke for sending me her copy and for telling me that Mrs Johnson, who she knew, had died.

Margaret Johnson’s book was beautifully produced and included not only the story of Smith’s life but some of his photographs as well as photographs of items he had sent or brought back to Spalding from China. One chapter in the book is devoted to Mrs Johnson’s three-week trip around China with her grandson in 2010 because:

Inspired and intrigued by Dr Jack’s account of his travels in China, I decided I would like to go and follow part of the journey myself…

The late Mrs Margaret Johnson at the
Terracotta Warriors in Xi'an in 2010
Margaret Johnson’s book, using family history and paperwork passed down from Jack Smith, together with assistance from the Baptist Missionary Society, filled in a number of gaps in my knowledge. I have also been able to follow up her work to fill in others.

John Arthur Creasey Smith was born on 18 May 1873 at Deeping St Nicholas, near Spalding in Lincolnshire to Robert Smith and Sarah, née Shepperson. Smith senior was a farmer; at the 1881 census he employed ’25 men and boys’. 

Smith, on non-official papers, used Creasey Smith as a non-hyphenated double-barrelled surname, probably to distinguish himself from the thousands of John (Jack) Smiths in the country. The Baptist Missionary Society used Creasey Smith name in its reports, for example. The Creasey name was a tribute to the family’s governess Louisa Creasey (1850-1904); she had charge of the early education of the Smiths’ ten children.

Jack Smith was educated at the Albert Memorial College (now a public, i.e. independent private, school called Framlingham College) in Suffolk. That was the information given by the University of Edinburgh in its commemoration of those who served in the First World War. However, Margaret Johnson said that he went to a boarding school in Reading.

He certainly was in Reading working for a seedsman from 1890 to 1893. In the 1891 Census he is listed as ‘apprentice seedsman’ living in lodgings. He had helped on his father’s farm in 1888-89. Baptist Missionary Society records show that he had wanted to be a missionary from the age of ten. His father built a mission chapel built on his land in 1896 but his desire to become a missionary was reinforced while attending Kings Road Baptist Church in Reading where he heard a talk by a missionary based in Delhi. Early, while at home, he had been a Sunday school teacher.

Jack Smith, newly graduated from
Edinburgh
Photograph taken in Spalding
From Mrs Johnson's book
In 1893 he matriculated at the University of Edinburgh to study medicine. In addition he was accepted as a student by the Edinburgh Medical Missionary Society (still extant as EMMS International). Missionary Society students had their fees paid by the charity. His address in Edinburgh was 8 Hope Park Square in 1898; he also gave as his address that the Society and its hostel at 56 George Square. He graduated M.B. Ch.B. in 1898.

The Baptist Missionary Society provided Margaret Johnson with records of his enquiries and application for missionary work in 1898. Smith made it clear that he wished to work in a hospital where he could provide continuity of medical care, rather than in in an ‘itinerating’ rôle. He also made it clear he did not see himself as suited for a mainly evangelistic work or for work in the tropics. China was his preferred posting. He applied formally in February 1898. The Society issued a questionnaire to candidates which examined their christian knowledge and faith as well as their health. He gave the names of five referees: three were from the Baptists in Reading (a primary school in Reading is named after one of them, E.P. Collier), a Spalding clergyman, and the Superintendent of the Edinburgh Medical Missionary Society. These are a few comments from his referees:

His habits are simple—his temper essentially unselfish—and his general deportment indicative of a steady plodding disposition which is his ruling characteristic. 

Without exception the members of his family are persons of ability, power and practicality. The family is Christian and I need not add of indisputable respectability.
 

In a letter from one of his fellow students…the writer says’ “I doubt if there is a man amongst the final lists this year who nows his work in a more practical way than Jack: he may not be crammed up in all the high flown theories which in a written exam give men good places, but there’s not one of them more fitted to go straight forward and begin to practice—good old Jack”.
 

As to habits, temper, and general deportment I should say they are ‘Scotch’ in character, what more can a ‘southerner’ say or hope for in a friend! but he is good fellow to get on with.

He was accepted as a medical missionary on 26 September 1898. His acceptance was being watched by a missionary based in what is now Xi’an (later of terracotta warriors fame) on leave in Scotland. Moir Black Duncan wrote to the Baptist Missionary Society pointing out the shortage of shortage of medical missionaries in Shensi (Shaanxi) because of deaths and illness. Duncan wanted—and got—Smith appointed. Duncan had obtained a house in Xi’an for use as a hospital. At that time the hospital was treating 2000 patients a year.

Newspapers reported Smith’s departure to China as a missionary. Thus, the Reading Mercury of 25 February 1899:

A public meeting, organised in connection with the Baptist Missionary Society, was held in the King’s-road Chapel, Reading, on Thursday evening, the 16 inst., for the purpose of bidding farewell to Dr. J. A. Creasey Smith, who is leaving England on the 27th inst. to engage in missionary work in China. There was a large audience…

In China: The Boxer Rebellion

Smith emerges as having a key and controversial rôle in the aftermath of the Boxer Rebellion of 1899-1901. On 9 July 1900 45 missionaries, their wives and children were massacred in the governor of Shanxi’s compound in Taiyuan, the provincial capital. That massacre, present-day authors note, came to represent the enormity of the Boxer’s actions in the western world; thousands of Chinese were killed and many other Europeans in smaller numbers but Taiyuan was a defining event. 

Press releases from the Baptist Missionary Society indicated that surviving missionaries were being evacuated to Shanghai and that on 2 August Mr & Mrs Moir Duncan and Dr. Creasey Smith were expected in ‘a day or two’.

Margaret Johnson suggests that Smith was in England in 1900 but the above report suggests he was caught up in the evacuation of surviving missionaries. She seems to have mistaken the year of the press reports on the evacuation.

Exactly one year after the massacre, Smith was one of two Baptists in a party of eight missionaries to re-enter Taiyuan at the invitation of the governor appointed by the new regime. An account from a diary on Wikipedia (full references there) of their arrival: 

…The scene to-day was a strange contrast. Thirty miles off, outriders inquired as to the time of our arrival. Ten miles off, the Governor’s body guard blared out their welcome and unfurled their standards. Two miles nearer, the Shan-si mounted police made salute. Three miles from the city, we exchanged our litters for Pekin carts to facilitate our reception. A large and representative body of Christians seemed delighted to welcome us. Their faces bore clear traces of the sufferings endured. From this point the procession rapidly increased, as we proceeded between rows of officials, both military and civil. At the entrance to the pavilion stood an Imperial officer, who stepped forward and said, "I welcome you in the name of the Emperor of China."

The controversy arose over the details of the massacre in 1900 and identifying those who actually took part in the killings. There was, and still is, no doubt that the then Governor, Yu Hsien, was responsible.

Smith had commissioned a local evangelist named Zhao to go to Shanxi in autumn 1900 to gather information on the massacre from people believed to have been eye witnesses. But he also ensured the publication in a newspaper of an account of the massacre by a Yong Zheng, an aticle that was syndicated around the world. Having witnessed Yong Zheng’s baptism in 1899, Smith believed his version of events. However, the accounts of Zhao and Yong Zheng differed as to the detailed description of each murder and the direct involvement of Yu Hsien in the killings. However, historians tend to discount the account of Yong Zheng as being a just too detailed and well-remembered sequence of events of the massacre when recalled nine months later.

Smith was involved with other missionaries in the erection of memorial tablets at Taiyuan (Arthur de Carle’s Sowerby’s father, Arthur Sowerby, who had been based at Taiyuan and escaped the massacre because the family was on home leave, was present) as well as at other towns in Shanxi were missionaries had been killed.

In China: After the Boxer upheavals

Back in Shaanxi (Shensi) Smith could not avoid the ‘itineration’ he had been so keen to avoid before arriving in China, although extensive accounts of missionary activities indicate that he began to work up the hospital practice in Xi’an in 1904 . In 1902 he wrote from Siugan that he was ill and under strain from overwork. He had been there since November 1901 and ‘holding the fort’ alone except for a few days. He noted that of the thirty-eight months since he had arrived in China, ‘more than thirty had been spent quite alone, and the amount of personal responsibility upon my shoulders  has sometimes been almost crushing’. He was asking for another medical missionary to be sent to join him.

An account of his medical ‘itinerations’ was published by the Baptist Missionary Society. It included the difficulties of transport, of being asked to treat incurable conditions, dealing with superstitious patients and noting the absence of hospitals other than those provided by the missions. Also included was a hefty lacing of religion for the readers at home who seemed more concerned with saving souls than saving lives. The following are extracts:

Imagine a springless cart drawn by a mule over an execrable track (one cannot dignify it by the name of road). We are seated, tailor fashion, with crossed legs, in this vehicle, and jolted and jogged, bumped and bruised, over thirty miles to San Yuan, our nearest station, to the north of the provincial capital. We are ferried across one river, wider than the Thames at London Bridge, and ford another, smaller, but much swifter. In the afternoon we reach our destination, thoroughly shaken and broiled. Mr. Madeley usually lives here, and it is pleasant to see him again after five months, and to have converse for a day or two, for we are both lonely bachelors, and live entirely alone. 

Now imagine a small courtyard—40 feet long and 10 feet wide—a preaching hall at one end, a kitchen at the other. At the sides are living rooms. It is summer time, and Chinese summer too, stiflingly hot, no breeze; even should there be one, it would hardly enter this confined courtyard, for the overhanging roofs almost meet above one's head. As soon as it is light, patients begin to arrive, and the space is soon full, with crowds more around the door. The medicines and instruments being prepared in the preaching hall, the doctor begins to see patients, whilst Mr. Madeley, an evangelist, and several Christians read and speak in turn of the Holy One of God, the Great Physician, and whilst one is endeavouring to alleviate bodily and mental pain and suffering, one’s brethren-in-arms are trying to lead those waiting to the Healer of Souls, from whom they may obtain everlasting life.
 

Two years ago Mr. Morgan was to have moved to this place, but we had to flee. And now, who is to corne? Previously there were ten of us in this Shensi field, now there are but four, and this with a larger work and an ever-increasing cry of ‘Come over and help us!’ Who will corne? and who will help with all his power (of prayer and money) if he cannot come himself!
 

Several candidates for baptism were here preparing to go to the Annual Summer Church Assembly.

Home Leave 1903-04

In 1903-04 Jack Smith was on home leave (I cannot find any evidence that he was on home leave in both 1902 and 1904 as suggested by Margaret Johnson). Missionaries were clearly expected to spread the word while on leave and local newspapers recorded his appearances at Baptist churches at services or special meetings where he spoke of his experiences. Collections were made for the missionary society. He was at South Shields in September 1903 and Todmorden in Yorkshire for Sunday service and the annual missionary meeting in October. He had not come from China alone, as the Todmorden & District News of 23 October reported:

…Dr. Smith then proceeded to give a brief history of the Chinese boy who accompanied him. Nine years ago, he said, the lad lived in a little village not far away from Tai Yuen Fu, but sickness visited his home, and father and mother died. A kind doctor, Dr. Edwards—(applause)—took care of him. He attended Mr. Farthing’s (one of the martyrs) school until three years ago, when such terrible things happened. Dr. Edwards’s hospital was burned to the ground, Miss Edith Combs was burned alive, and it was realised that it was dangerous to allow the schoolboys to stay at Mr. Farthing’s any longer. They were sent to their homes, but this one had none to go to, for his relatives would not accept him. Two years ago the lad joined him that Pekin, and had been with him ever since, having travelled with him right across China. The reason he brought the lad to England was to arouse and increase the interest in foreign mission work all over the country.(Applause.)… Dr Creasey Smith afterwards exhibited maybe interesting Chinese curios. Both he and the Chinese lad wore national habiliments.—In point of interest it was the best missionary meeting held in Hebden-bridge for many years.

By November he had moved on to Faringdon, then in Berkshire, and it is the press report of this meeting that solved the question of his marriage. Both Margaret Johnson and I had come to the conclusion that he must have met his wife in China. She found that they were married in Ireland. However, there was another clue in the answers he gave in the Baptist Missionary Society’s questionnaire: ‘but circumstances prevent me from making any definite statements, at present, regarding marriage before going out’. Mrs Johnson knew from family records that his wife’s name was Annie Richardson Bailey. And who was a nurse at Faringdon Cottage Hospital (39 miles from Reading) at the 1901 Census? Annie Richardson Bailey. And who in his visit to Faringdon in November 1903 modelled a Chinese dress he had brought with him to the Baptist meeting? ‘Miss Bailey’. I suspect they had met while he was returning to stay in with church friends in Reading from medical school before he went to China in 1899, and that was the reason he was guarded in his intentions about marriage in his 1898 application to the missionary society.

He was in Bristol in February 1904 where he explained how medical services had ‘led to the spread of the Gospel’. He also said  it was worthwhile returning to China and ‘told the pathetic story of martydom by a family of Christian natives, who in the late Boxer rising preferred death to denying their Saviour”. ‘He was’, he then said,’working in a province as large as England, and there were only two medical missionaries there; in the next province there was none at all, so altogether he had a parish as large as Great Britain to look after with twenty to twenty-five millions [sic] inhabitants’.

The baptists of Bratton in Wiltshire saw him in March 1904. He was in Spalding for his youngest sister’s wedding on 27 April. But then came his marriage to Miss Bailey on 18 May in the Belfast Registration District of Ireland. Annie Richardson Bailey was born on 5 September 1878, the daughter of William John Bailey and Margaret Ann Nicholson Bailey, at Lisburn in northern Ireland. Annie’s father (1848-1941) was a furniture dealer of 30 Bow Street, Lisburn.

Smith’s appearance in Chinese dress at missionary meetings in England really does seem to reflect what the foreigners at the missions wore from day to day. Margaret Johnson shows several photographs of missionaries thus attired. Perhaps it was done in order to ‘fit in’ and put their nervous patients and potential converts at ease. Today it would be condemned by some as ‘cultural appropriation’.

On 5th September there was a send-off meeting at a chapel in Islington as missionaries were returning to China, Doctor and Mrs. Smith amongst them.

1904-1908 and the end of missionary work

Smith was Britain again in 1906 but this time there is only one newspaper report of his presence at a Baptist event, this one near his base at Spalding: the South Lincolnshire Baptist Sunday School Teachers’ Conference in July. Shipping records show he travelled on the Empress of Canada from Hong Kong to Vancouver (he arrived there on 3 January 1906) and crossed the U.S.A. and then the Atlantic in the S.S. Lucania to Liverpool.

Shipping records show that he travelled to Canada on Canadian Pacific’s R.M.S. Empress of Britain. The Montreal Gazette of 26 July noted that on 18 July Smith had proposed a unanimous resolution of the second-class passengers thanking the members of the crew responsible for the service they had received while on board. I have not been able to find whether he crossed Canada and continued to China or if was visiting Canada and then returned to Britain. His wife did not accompany him on this home visit, presumably staying with the mission.

I also do not know when he and Annie arrived in Britain in time for them to leave Liverpool for Canada in 1907.

One directory of missionaries in China shows that Smith left the mission in 1905; that date is confirmed by a memorial volume on one of his colleagues, Stanley Jenkins. So he must have been back in England in 1906 because of ill health.  However, his final severance from the missionary society only came in 1908. In view of his plans to move to Canada in 1907 that seems the most reasonable explanation for the discrepancy in dates. He had decided by 1907 that return to the missionary life was impossible.

R. Fletcher Moorshead, the Medical Secretary of the Baptist Missionary Society, in his review of the medical work of the society, Heal the Sick (London: Carey Press, 1929) wrote:

The summer of 1908 witnessed a number of reinforcements for the medical mission staff which were more than welcome as it was also a time of enforced retirements on account of ill-health. Dr. Creasey Smith, the medical pioneer of the Shensi medical mission, was obliged to relinquish the prospect of further mission work through that cause.

It is not easy to appreciate the vast effort and organisation that went into missionary work from Britain, the U.S.A. and some European countries and only on reading such reports could I get any appreciation of the scale of proselytization, social work, education and medical aid going on, all supported by large amounts of money raised by huge voluntary organisations back home. After reading it all, I am left with a feeling of both horror at the concept of promoting any religion, let alone with such fervour, and admiration for the genuine good that the education and medical aid did. We should also not forget the very high death rate from disease of the missionaries, as even a rapid look through the book on Stanley Jenkins shows. It seems that typhus was the major cause of death.

Canada

Jack and Annie, aged 34 and 29, sailed on 18 September 1907 from Liverpool on board the Allan Lines ship Carthaginian. They landed at Halifax, Nova Scotia bound for the town of Peachland in British Columbia. There, Margaret Johnson shows a receipt for $200 as initial payment on a Lot 7-2538 dated 25 October 1907 and another for $500 for the first payment on a different lot, 015-2538 from 4 December. Peachland was then a new town on the shores of Okanagan Lake and thought to be ideal for fruit growing.

Mrs Johnson indicates that the Smiths intended to settle in Peachland. Were they perhaps intent on setting up in practice with Jack as the doctor and Annie the nurse? Whatever, Mrs Johnson wrote: ‘For some reason, Jack and Annie spent barely two years in Canada’. I have been unable to find any information for this period in their lives and the episode leaves questions unanswered. Did they complete the payment on their lot or lots and did they build a house, for example?

Jack and Annie were not the only Smiths in Peachland. Jack’s cousin, Edward Freeman Smith, lived there; he was a beneficiary named in Jack’s will. Was he the owner of one of the plots Jack made an initial payment for in 1907? I have every reason to believe Edward Freeman Smith was born on 26 September 1883 at Deeping St Nicholas and died on Vancouver Island on 17 May 1968; he was a farmer.

China Again and Two Expeditions

The Smiths, after Canada, appear to have been based in Shanghai from around 1909. Jack then took part in two arduous expeditions within and beyond China. The question that has to be asked is how he managed that after having to quit as a medical missionary because of ill health.

The first expedition which began in 1909 and part of the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration, was the reason I became interested in Dr Smith and his eponymous mammals. He, the leader Malcolm Playfair Anderson, and Frank Kingdon Ward were those taking part. He was listed as assistant to Anderson when the Exploration ended in 1911.


From Mrs Johnson's book

My guess is that Smith replaced Sowerby for what turned out to be the last part of the Exploration, on the recommendation of Sowerby. As i wrote above, the Sowerby’s father was a Baptist missionary who had met Smith. Sowerby junior was born in Taiyuan.

Then, in 1911-12, he was hired by George Fenwick-Owen (1882-1971) for a hunting and collecting trip in China. An account of that expedition was written by Fenwick-Owen's companion for the trip, the big-game hunter Harold Frank Wallace (1881-1962). They ran into difficulties as the violent upheavals that led to the fall of the Qing Dynasty began. To avoid the conflicts the expedition made its way in considerable discomfort across the Gobi desert to Russia.


Crossing the Gobi Desert
From Mrs Johnson's book

I will not go into these expeditions further here but having more information will write about them later.

There is evidence that Smith was still spending time in Xi’an. He wrote an appreciation of his fellow medical missionary Stanley Jenkins who had travelled to China with the Smiths in 1904. In it stated that after their first year together, ‘I have made frequent and extended visits to S-an-fu [Xi’an], often staying with him for months at a time, and so speak from experience and observation’. Smith rushed from Hangkow (Hankou), 500 miles away, when summoned by telegraph to Jenkins’s deathbed, having left him a few days earlier in apparent health because, ‘I was obliged to return to Hankow’. But what was Smith doing during these years. Did he have some sort of medical practice? Was he ‘itinerating’? Or was he being paid by the wealthy Oldfield Thomas as one of his private collectors sending specimens to the Natural History Museum in London after the Duke of Bedford's sponsoship ended?

Harold Wallace in  book describing his expedition wrote highly of Smith and gave his address in Shanghai:

Much of the success of our trip was due to the assistance of Dr. J. A. C. Smith, 320, Avenue Paul Brunat, Shanghai, and those who contemplate following in our footsteps cannot do better than secure his services. Talking the language like a native, he understands the Chinese thoroughly, and has a complete knowledge of skinning and preserving both large and small mammals and birds. I must express my indebtedness to him for much of the information I obtained. Had it not been for his knowledge of the natives and his skill in translating I should have remained in ignorance concerning many interesting points. 

Avenue Paul Brunat, incidentally, was in the French Concession. It is now a section of Huai Hai Lu.

Smith was still in China in 1915 because on 9 May he wrote from Yen-an Fu (Yan’an) to George Ernest  “Chinese” Morrison (1862-1920), then political adviser to the Chinese Republic and former correspondent of The Times, on the continued production of opium in Shaanxi. The editor of Morrison’s letter notes that Smith was one of Morrison’s regular sources of information. 

Dear Dr. Morrison, 
I do not doubt you are a busy man these days when so much advice is needed. Still I know you are intensely interested in what is happening in the interior of this country as well, and possibly a line on Opium may not be out of place… 

Opium growing was almost entirely abolished in this province of Shensi last year, and in the autumn, when it is sown in the Southern and more fertile part of the province, strict proclamations were issued forbidding its growth. In late February and early March, however, the people were given to understand (not by proclamation, but secretly) that they might grow it as freely as they liked, a heavy tax to be levied on the acreage. I personally met two deputies sent by Lu Chien Chang the Chiang Chun, to see Mr. Shorrock the Senior English Missionary at Sianfu, to ask him to be silent about this matter and not report it to Minister or Consul, as Lu said he must do it to raise funds to pay his troops. Mr. Shorrock refused to make any promise of any nature regarding the matter - Spring sown poppy was now largely put in the ground and I personally have seen many thousands of mou of land growing it during this last few days.
 

About the 1st of May, new proclamations were issued threatening the direst penalties on all who grow it and ordering the instant plowing up of all sown. This after I had seen in the P[eking] & T[ientsin] Times a note of the impeachment of the Governor Lu of this province, for allowing its growth. The opium is still growing however and is being cultivated, the plants separated etc. This is not secretly, but openly done alongside the big main roads. This is evidently by orders of the Provincial Government for each Hsien or small town has its Opium Suppression Bureau, with soldiers and officials in abundance at their offices, many of them smoking the drug themselves, yet the opium grows within bowshot of the offices.Lu Chien Chang is a very heavy smoker himself, he is reputed to consume 2 ozs daily. He certainly accepted a gift of 20,000 ozs from Chang Yiin San, Shensi’s Brigadier-General and Ko lao hwei leader, when he arrived in Sianfu a year ago. Yesterday, in this city of Yen an fu, men were paraded on the streets with paper notices stuck on their backs and carrying gongs which they were beating, and accompanied by soldiers, a punishment for selling opium in small quantities - whilst well-to-do shop-keepers were heavily fined. Yet within 100 yards of the city wall opium is growing in abundance…

First World War

The University of Edinburgh’s memorial rolls show that from October 1916 until September 1917, Smith was with the Balkan Convoy, Ambulance of the French Red Cross, British Section (information on its formation and rôle here). He is shown, with Creasey spelt ‘Creasy’ as a Medical Officer in the Register of Overseas Volunteers of the British Red Cross.

After that voluntary service, he was appointed to the Royal Army Medical Corps, the appointment to begin on arrival in France—which turned out to be 22 October 1917. He served as a medical officer at a hospital at Noyelles-sur-Mer set up to treat the Chinese Labour Corps, non-combatants recruited in China doing essential work to support the armies in the field. Arthur de Carle Sowerby served as an officer in the headquarters of the Corps. Smith was promoted Captain in October 1918 just before the war ended. After the Armistice in November 1918, the Corps continued its work to clear the battlefields. Then, during 1919 and 1920, all 96,000 remaining in France were shipped back to China. Illness, including the flu epidemic took its toll; 900 graves are at Noyelles, with others elsewhere.

Jack Smith travelled back to China with the Labour Corps. It would seem that he completed the job in Hong Kong in June 1920, for there, Mrs Johnson shows a receipt from the army medical stores for instruments returned by Smith including ‘Forceps, Dressing 3’ and ‘Probe, 1’. He stayed in Hong Kong for a month (from 30 June, the day he returned the stores, until 20 July) at the Carlton Hotel for which he was charged 90 Hong Kong dollars. I do not know if he had been in Shanghai before Hong Kong but shipping records show he sailed from Hong Kong on the Empress of Canada and arrived in Vancouver on 9 August. There he visited his cousin, Edward Freeman Smith in Peachland, and then travelled across Canada to leave Quebec for Liverpool on board Canadian Pacific’s Prinz Friedrich Wilhelm (surrendered by Germany; later Cunard’s Empress of India). His ‘intended future residence’ on arrival at Liverpool on 31 August 1920 was ticked as a ‘foreign country’.

Annie Smith is shown as arriving in New York from Liverpool en route to Shanghai on 24 January 1920. In view of later developments it is interesting that she showed as her contact in the passenger list her father, W.J. Bailey of Bow Street, Lisburn, and not her husband, Jack. She can then be found arriving on board the Japanese ship, Arabia Maru, at Victoria, British Columbia, Canada on 18 August 1920, probably in time to overlap with Jack Smith’s stay with his cousin at Peachland. However, she did not accompany him on the ship to England.

In passenger lists, Jack Smith always gave his address in England as Selby House, High Street, Spalding. The ‘Misses Smith’ were shown as living there is Kelly’s Directory for 1919; they were his sisters, Helen and Annie.

Ship’s Doctor

Then Smith’s life took a different turn. He became a ship’s doctor and thanks to the records of merchant seamen’s tickets we have fairly detailed account of his voyages as well as a photograph from those records.

Smith worked for the New Zealand Shipping Company on board six ships (Paparoa, Ruahine, Wiltshire, Rimutaka, Suffolk and Hororata) between November 1920 and 1926. They were either refrigerated transport ships with passenger accommodation or just passenger ships, all travelling between New Zealand and Britain via the Panama Canal. The company insisted that its ships call at Pitcairn to relieve the monotony of the Pacific passage. Visiting ships brought relief to the inhabitants of that island. Smith, the ship’s doctor, was probably needed on Pitcairn on occasion.

Divorce

Smith divorced his wife in 1924; the decree absolute came on 9 February 1925. Margaret Johnson found a press cutting in a local Spalding newspaper describing the graphic details. A similar report was in the Nottingham Evening Post of 30 July 1924. Smith named Frederick John Wetherstone-Melville as co-respondent.



Thanks to the Wetherstone-Melville family (see below) who contacted me after the first version of this article appeared, I now know much more about what happened in Shanghai. A number of gaping holes and loose ends in the story of what happened to Annie after the divorce have been cleared up.

Fred Wetherstone-Melville had an interesting early but sad personal life. His date of birth was during the second quarter of 1885 (he was christened on 21 July) in Maidstone, Kent. While working as a ‘Draper’s Shopman’ he enlisted at Deal in Kent in the Royal Marines on 12 January 1901; on his records his date of birth is shown as 12 January 1883 which is clearly incorrect. My guess is that he pretended to be 18 in order to enlist. He served first in the Plymouth Division, then on board the pre-dreadnought battleship, H.M.S. Empress of India, then ashore in the Royal Marine Light Infantry Chatham Division and finally on the cruiser, H.M.S. Astraea. His character and ability were judged to be ‘Very Good’ throughout. He was discharged by purchase on 30 April 1906 and his address was given as ‘Health Department, Shanghai’. Astraea had arrived on the China Station in 1906 and my guess is that he bought his discharge in order to join the Health Department of the Municipal Council of the international settlement in Shanghai.

Frederick Wetherstone Melville in the uniform
of the Shanghai Volunteer Force

The Health Department sent its inspectors for training in U.K. They had much to do in the prevention of disease and by all accounts achieved much in making Shanghai a healthier place to live. Wetherstone-Melville clearly rose in the ranks of the department and Shanghai society; in 1912 he was Master of the masonic lodge. He also served as a Captain in the Shanghai Volunteer Force where his training and experience as a private soldier in the Royal Marines must have proved useful. On his first marriage, to Alice Sophia Farrow (‘lately arrived from England’) on 31 January 1910, at the Holy Trinity Cathedral in Shanghai, his colleagues presented him with a silver jug. At her marriage Alice was shown as 37 and Frederick as 24. From the marriage records we can identify Alice as having been born in late 1872 in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk. Her father was George, a sergeant in the 12th Regiment of Foot or East Suffolk Regiment. In 1891 she was a domestic servant and in 1901 was a nurse working in London. No unequivocal record exists for what happened to Alice. She was alive in 1912 since the Wetherstone-Melvilles arrived back in Shanghai on Norddeutscher Lloyd’s S/S Princess Alice. Given the apparent reluctance of registrars to deal with double-barrelled surnames and the absence of a death record in Shanghai, it is possible that her death is listed as Melville and, indeed, there is listed the death of an Alice Sophia Melville of the right age in Reading, Berkshire, in 1915.


Wetherstone-Melville in his carriage in Shanghai


Wetherstone-Melville next married Ada Blanche Hill on 29 May 1917 in Shanghai. She had a son in England in 1920 and travelled back to Shanghai with the 4-month old from London on 26 February 1921 on board Glen Line’s S/S Gleniffer. That marriage did not last. Wetherstone-Melville obtained a divorce on the grounds of her adultery. Although he was given custody of the young son it was on condition that he lived in England where the mother had returned. He was unable to do this, and the child, then two, remained with his mother who never told the boy that he had a father who then lived in Canada. Only on joining the Life Guards at the age of 17 did he get to know about his father.

It was around this time, 1923, as explained above that Annie broke up with Smith and travelled back to U.K. with Wetherstone-Melville. Shipping records match the report in the newspapers. Wetherstone-Melville described as Chief Health Inspector for Shanghai Municipal Council, and Annie Smith, ‘Trained Nurse’, left Shanghai in April 1923 on the American President Lines ship President Pierce bound for San Francisco where they arrived on 3 May en route to England. The White Star Line’s Baltic brought them from New York to Liverpool where they landed on 4 June.

On 20 October they left Southampton for Shanghai on S.S President Arthur bound for New York, where a handwritten note was added on the passenger list to show they were to stay at the Belmont Hotel (since demolished but once the tallest hotel in the world). Wetherstone-Melville was shown as having a diplomatic visa for the U.S.A. Annie stated as a relative her sister, Mrs W.H. Powley of 62 Durley Road, Stamford Hill in North London..

Annie and Wetherstone-Melville were married in Shanghai on 9 April 1925. Her name appeared as Annie Richardson Creassy-Smith [sic] in the announcement in the London and China Express of 21 May 1925.

The Wetherstone-Melvilles did not stay in Shanghai for long. They sailed from Hong Kong in 1926 and landed as immigrants in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. He died in 1950, in Victoria. Shipping records show that Annie, by then a naturalized Canadian, entered the U.S.A. in a ship at Tacoma on 22 March 1951. She was travelling first class on the Holland-America Line’s cargo-passenger ship Dalerdijk’s voyage from Vancouver to Seattle, San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Thanks to the daughter and son-in-law of ‘Shanghai Fred’s’ son from his second marriage we now know what happened to Annie, and have a photograph of her. Sometime after Fred’s death she moved back to Northern Ireland where she died on 23 September 1968, aged 90. She left part of her estate to the step-son she had never met. Fred, in his relatively short life, had obviously come a long way from the ‘draper’s shopman’ who enlisted in the Royal Marines.


Annie and Fred Wetherstone-Melville
in Vancouver


We know little of Annie’s life in China, the nurse in the cottage hospital at Faringdon and the assistant matron of a hospital in Shanghai. She was listed as a member of the medical mission at Xi’an after her marriage in 1904. As Margaret Johnson noted: ‘Life cannot have been easy for Annie Smith during their marriage, with Jack constantly travelling…’. We do though know, from the details provided for U.S. immigration in the passenger lists that she was 5’ 5” in height, of fresh complexion with brown hair and blue eyes. She was a shown as a Quaker (Society of Friends) as were her parents in the 1911 Census.

I have tried—and failed—to find anything on Annie’s life in Shanghai or the hospital at which she worked. The only clue of an association with the medical profession is her entering the name of a doctor as her ‘friend’ on her voyage from Shanghai in 1923. He was Dr A.G. Parrott of 31 North Szechuan Road, Shanghai. A. George Parrott had an interesting history. He died on 22 May 1923 aged 67, only a month after Annie’s departure. His obituary in the British Medical Journal shows that he was a missionary who returned to London with his first wife and young family to become a medical student. After six years at the London Hospital he returned to China as a medical missionary. His first wife died in North China and as a result of the Boxer Rebellion he set himself up in private practice in Shanghai while engaging in all sorts of mission work. He was visiting physician to the Shantung Road Hospital for Chinese (still in existence under a different name). Was that where Annie was assistant matron?

New Zealand

Jack Smith in his uniform as a ship's
doctor. Note the First World War medal
ribbons.
From Mrs Johnson's book
Margaret Johnson suggests that Smith moved to Wellington, New Zealand as a permanent base while he was working for the shipping line. However, this may have been after he had stopped travelling as a ship’s doctor. On his final trip to Spalding from Wellington in 1928 as a passenger on the Shaw, Savill and Albion’s line, Arawa, which arrived in London on 20 April 1928, he showed his intended country of residence as England. However, when he departed on 29 June on the New Zealand Shipping Company’s Ruapehu from Southampton to return to Wellington, he is shown with New Zealand as his intended country of permanent residence.

The press report on Margaret Johnson’s book states that Smith was never mentioned in the family because of his divorce—very difficult for those younger than 60 to believe but absolutely true for the decades up to the 1970s. In the English middle and working classes, divorce just did not happen to ‘respectable’ people. Such a matter would not be spoken of out loud but teacups would have rattled with the whispered gossip about the family in the towns and villages of south Lincolnshire. Poor Smith. He was better off at sea and in New Zealand.

Jack Smith died on 4 May 1929, aged 55, of a cerebral haemorrhage, at 135 Hataitai Road, Wellington, New Zealand on 4 May 1929. His grave is in the Karori Cemetery, Wellington. Mrs Johnson found an obituary in a local newspaper:

Dr J Smith, who for many years travelled as a medical officer on board the New Zealand shipping company’s steamers between England and the Dominion, and who was thus well known to thousands of New Zealanders, died at Haitaitai on Saturday. He was specially noted for his devotion to children on his many voyages. He was a native of Spalding, Lincolnshire and was 57 years of age [he was actually 55, two weeks short of his 56th birthday], being a school mate of Rev D.C. Bates of this city [Wellington]. For many years he was a medical missionary in China until his health broke down. The funeral was held yesterday morning, the service at the graveside at Karori being conducted by Rev. Cannon Sykes and Rev. D.C. Bates.

His will was granted probate in England. He left £6411 19s. 11d. The beneficiaries were two cousins (one was the one he visited in Peachtown, Canada, Edward Freeman Smith) and a nephew.

We now know

At least we now know who Smith was and what he did in the unstable and dangerous years of late 19th and early 20th century China—events that still echo loudly in the internal polities of modern China.

And we can write an amended version of his entry in the Eponym Dictionary of Mammals:

Smith, J.A.C.
     Smith’s Shrew. Chodsigoa smithii Thomas, 1911
     Smith’s Zokor. Eospalax smithii Thomas 1911
Dr. John (‘Jack’) Arthur Creasey Smith (1873-1929), born in Spalding, Lincolnshire, England was an Edinburgh medical graduate who joined Malcolm P. Anderson in 190-11 when the latter was leader of the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration of Eastern Asia for the Zoological Society of London. Both the shrew and the zokor (mole-rat) come from Central China. Smith was also a member of Harold Wallace’s expedition in 1911-12. Dr. Smith, a former medical missionary and medical officer in World War I became a ship’s doctor in the 1920s. He died in New Zealand.



The description of Smith's Zokor in Handbook of Mammals
of the World
, Volume 7. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona 2017

...and his shrew, from Volume 8, 2018

And the Chinese boy?

…And what happened to the Chinese boy who Smith brought to Britain in 1903/4? Well, Mrs Johnson provided the answer but I do not know the source of her information:

…he had brought with him two Chinese boys: Li and Cheng T’en Yu. They both attended Spalding Grammar School. Li went on to Edinburgh University where he graduated as a Doctor. They both eventually went back to China and continued to have medical careers in the hospital in Xian…
——————— §§§ ———————

There are a number of unanswered questions on the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration, for example, why the expedition was tagged as the Zoological Society of London’s when it was clearly a series of collecting expeditions for Oldfield Thomas of the Natural History Museum. Having now read a considerable amount about the Exploration I am by no means certain the Zoological Society of London was involved at all. It seems to me that Malcolm Playfair Anderson and, after his death, his father, conflated the British Museum (Natural History) and the Zoological Society of London since the Duke of Bedford who paid for the Exploration was President of the latter at the time.


*The equivalent of £304,000 based on retail price index or £713,000 on increases in income (GDP/capita).

Beolens B, Watkins M, Grayson M. 2009. The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Bickers R, Tiedemann R.G. 2007. The Boxers, China and the World. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield

Glover R. 1914. Herbert Stanley Jenkins MD FRCS. Medical Missionary, Shensi, China. London: Carey Press.

Lo H-M (editor). 1978. The Correspondence of G.E. Morrison II. 1912-1920. Cambridge University Press

LAST UPDATED 11 March 2022

Saturday, 11 May 2019

The Duke of Bedford’s Zoological Exploration of Eastern Asia in the 1900s—2. Anderson, Sowerby and Ward

We know the following were participants in the 1904-11 Exploration. The leader was Malcolm Playfair Anderson and the following were involved for longer or shorter periods of time: Arthur de Carle Sowerby in 1908 and then Frank Kingdon Ward and Dr J.A.C. Smith after Anderson's return to China in 1909. A great deal is known about and has been published about Sowerby and Kingdon Ward but virtually nothing of Smith, although I now have more information on him than was available previously; he will be the subject of a ffurther article in this series.

Malcolm Playfair Anderson


Malcolm Playfair Anderson
1879-1919
Anderson’s father, Melville, Professor of English Literature at Stanford from 1891 to 1910, had the sad job of writing his son’s obituary for Condor, the ornithological journal. Malcolm Anderson was born in Indiana in 1879. For two years in his early teens he was in Germany with his mother and siblings. He returned to the U.S.A. highly unimpressed with both the educational system and militarist schoolboys amongst whom survival depended on ‘force of arms and fists’.

He graduated from Stanford in 1904 with a degree in zoology. However, from the age of 14 he had been on several collecting expeditions in the U.S.A. Somehow he must have come to the attention of Oldfield Thomas at the Natural History Museum in London for he was immediately employed by the Zoological Society of London to conduct the exploration being paid for by the Duke of Bedford, so his father wrote. However, I am by no means convinced the Zoological Society was involved, with both Anderson and his father seeming to conflate the two organisations. The confusion may have been because the Duke was President of the Society at the time.

He collected, he wrote and he photographed through Japan, Korea and China. This is his description of collecting a wildcat on the island of Tsushima, midway between Japan and Korea:

From our hilltop we wandered on down a trail singing and whistling, till we met a man on horseback and another on foot. The horseman dismounted and bowed, then passed on. The man on foot paused and addressed us. He was a funny old fellow with a bald head. Orii answered, told him our business, and asked him about animals. His answers were not very clear, as he had had too much sake. However we gathered that one of his neighbors had recently killed a wildcat, and the old man thought possibly it was still unskinned. WC asked directions and were told to go to the next village and ask for his house (his name, he said, was ‘Man of the Shining Head’ and he was distinguished as the best drinker in his village). We found the owner of the cat (which was skinned). I bought the skin for two yen, and asked about the body. It had been given away. We went to the neighbor who had received it and found that he had eaten part of the cat and buried the head and vertebrae. To dig the thing up was the work of a moment, and we were in possession of scientific evidence of the presence of the wildcat on Tsu-shima.

The cat is regarded as a subspecies of the Leopard Cat, Prionailurus bengalensis, locally critically endangered and the subject of active conservation measures.

In 1908, he travelled to Europe and worked on his collections but returned to China in 1909 to continue the exploration, to ‘the desert of the north beyond the Great Wall, and in the mountains on the border of Thibet’.

I do not know how the finances of the Exploration worked but Anderson is said to have sold the skin of the last confirmed wolf seen on Honshu to the Natural History Museum in London for 8.50 yen. However, is it not possible that having paid two hunters for the carcass, he was simply reclaiming expenses?

After his work on the exploration Anderson made two collecting trips to South America, the second with his wife whom he had married in 1913. He was ill after the second expedition but managed to write some articles on his travels. In 1918 an appeal was launched to encourage men in the U.S.A. to work in the shipyards. Anderson volunteered but he was killed by a fall from scaffolding from a shipyard in Oakland on 21 February 1919. He was 39. His only child, a son, died in infancy.

Oldfield Thomas named three species after Malcolm Anderson: a vole, Myodes andersoni; a shrew-mole Uropsilus andersoni and a niviventer, Niviventer andersoni.

I have found three articles by Anderson, published posthumously in Natural History in 1920, on experiences in China. They are listed below.

Arthur de Carle Sowerby

In his account of his work on the Clark Expedition, Sowerby explained where he went on the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration:

Before going into details of the present work, it might be well to say something about that already done in the same districts. In connection with the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration of Eastern Asia in the early part of 1908, Mr. Malcolm P. Anderson and the writer had already made collections of mammals in Shensi [Shaanxi Province], at Yen-an Fu and Yü-lin Fu. We also collected in the mountains of Shansi (Shanxi Province], north-west of T’ai-yüan Fu.

As well as a biography published in 1956, Sowerby was the subject of a major article in the Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society for 1998-99. Keith Stevens introduced it as follows:

Although the lives of many Western expatriates who lived in China and experienced the excitements and horrors of travel and the exoticism of the old civilisation cry out to be recorded, most expatriates lived mundane, cliché-ridden existences, apart that is from the occasional excitement caused by the troubles and emergencies of the times, brigandage, rioting and war. They never or only very rarely ventured far from their Treaty Fort and certainly not into the dark hinterland of China. Should they have ventured anywhere at all it would have been to hunt or shoot in the immediate area of the Port or go to a nearby beach or classical tourist site, such as Nanking or Soochou. And of all only a mere handful of those who did venture far afield have left sufficient records to enable a portrait of their life to be disentangled and recorded. Arthur de C. Sowerby was one such venturer.

Arthur Sowerby was born in China to missionary parents in 1885 and lived in interesting times: through the fall of the Manchu Dynasty; the era of the War Lords; Nationalists versus Communists; invasion, occupation and internment by the Japanese. He retired first to U.K. and then to the U.S.A. where he died in 1954. Towards the end of the First World War he served in the Army where, in view of his complete fluency in Chinese dialects, he served as an officer in the Chinese Labour Corps. By this time he was suffering from arthritis which plagued him for the rest of his life.

Stevens describes Sowerby as an explorer and author but as a man who needed to earn his living, at least, perhaps, until he married his second, American, wife in 1922. The dire state of his finances was noted in his correspondence with Clark. There are gaps in the record in which it is not known what he was about. Educated in China, Bath and the University of Bristol, he did not complete his degree course but ran away to sea after a failed romance. He worked his passage to Canada, stayed there for a while before returning to China and his parents in 1905.  He taught at the Anglo-Chinese College in Tientsin but it is thought he only stayed there for the year before he joined the Duke of Bedford’s exploration. He was paid by Robert Sterling Clark for the duration of that expedition and for his collecting expeditions over the next 20 years, and may well have continued teaching in Tientsin.

In late 1911 he took part in the Shensi Relief Expedition to rescue and lead to safety foreign missionaries caught up in the aftermath of the revolution. An account of this successful mission through country where banditti were rampaging was written by Sowerby for an appendix to a book on the fall of the Manchu Dynasty.

Manchuria and parts of Mongolia were the subject of four expeditions. After his demobilisation in 1919 he stayed in Edinburgh for a year to complete his five-volume work, The Naturalist in Manchuria. By 1921 he was off back to China via the U.S.A. where further expeditions followed, again through bandit-ridden country.

For around 25 years he lived in Shanghai. He produced and published a monthly periodical, the China Journal. He served as honorary director of the Shanghai Museum, one of the activities of the Royal Asiatic Society. He was president of the China Society of Science of Art which was incorporated into the Royal Asiatic Society. He later served as president of the latter. He had his publishing business and was a director of other companies. He took an active part in the Shanghai International Settlement, the residents’ associations, for example. 

A jerboa was named after Sowerby by Thomas as Dipus sowerbyi. It is now recognised as a synonym of Dipus sagitta, the Northern Three-toed Jerboa.

Frank Kingdon Ward (publishing as Kingdon-Ward)

Frank Kingdon Ward
1885-1958
I will not dwell on the explorer, plant collector and author, Francis Kingdon Ward (1885-1958) simply because there is a whole website devoted to his life and further information elsewhere. However, he took part in one expedition of the exploration because of his extraordinary family connexions. Ward’s father was Professor of Botany at Cambridge. The early death of his father left Frank needing to find paid work after two years at Cambridge rather than the three needed for a degree. A family friend, none other than one of the authors of the Wade-Giles system of transliteration of the Chinese language into roman characters—and Professor of Chinese at Cambridge—Herbert Allen Giles, pulled strings in Shanghai and Frank Ward soon found himself teaching at a school in that city.

During the long school holidays he visited Java and Borneo but after two years, another school friend—this time Oldfield Thomas—saw him recruited for the Duke of Bedford’s exploration for another collecting expedition. He wrote that trip up, the approximate route of which is shown on the website, in his On the Road to Tibet. He was accompanied by Dr J.A.C. Smith.

Thomas named a vole, Eothenomys wardi and a shrew, Blarinella wardi for Ward.

Ward went on to many further and alarming travels and much plant-hunting in Assam, Burma, China and Tibet. He served in the Indian Army in the First World War, as a spy in Tibet, and taught survival techniques in the Second World War.


Anderson MB. 1919. Malcolm Playfair Anderson. Condor 21, 115-119

Clark RS, Sowerby A deC. 1912. Through Shên-kan. London: T Fisher Unwin

Sowerby RR. 1956. Sowerby of China : Arthur de Carle Sowerby F.R.G.S., F.Z.S. Kendal: Titus Wilson.
The author was Richard Raine Sowerby (1887-1968) a solicitor, farmer and local historian. He described himself as a distant kinsman of Arthur Sowerby.

Stevens K. 1998-9. Naturalist, author, artist, explorer and editor and an almost forgotten president: Arthur de Carle Sowerby 1885-1954: President of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 1935-1940. Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 38, 121-136

Ward FK. 1910. On the Road to Tibet. Shanghai: Shanghai Mercury

Articles by Malcolm Playfair Anderson in Natural History Volume 20:
For the sake of his ancestors, pp 92-99;
The discovery of the Chinese Takin. pp 428-433;
A winter journey in northern China. 517-534.

UPDATED 5 September 2019

Wednesday, 8 May 2019

The Duke of Bedford’s Zoological Exploration of Eastern Asia in the 1900s—But some sources get the wrong duke

When I was looking up stuff on the rodents of China before and after our trip to Sichuan in November 2017, I came across references to Oldfield Thomas (of his eponymous pika) and to the Zoological Society of London’s exploration of eastern Asia paid for by the Duke of Bedford. Reading further I realised there were errors—amplified of course by repetition on the internet—in some of the secondary accounts.

11th Duke of Bedford
The Duke of Bedford from 1893 until his son inherited the title on his death in 1940 was the 11th Duke, Herbrand Arthur Russell (1858-1940). He was President of the Zoological Society of London from 1899 until 1935 and is well known for gathering the last live specimens of Père David’s Deer after the Boxer Rebellion and building up a herd at Woburn, his country seat in Bedfordshire.  Less welcome was his rôle in introducing the Grey Squirrel from North America.

Unfortunately, some accounts by authors, who should have known better, of the exploration paid for by the 11th Duke, attribute the naming of the exploration to his son (whom he loathed and was loathed equally in return), the 12th Duke, Hastings William Sackville Russell (1888-1953). Hasting Russell who inherited the title in 1940 (before then he used the junior title of Marquess of Tavistock) was a cranky pacifist, fascist and famous aviculturist.

The personalities and lifestyles of these two Dukes of Bedford is described by the 13th Duke, John Ian Robert Russell (1917-2002) in his book, A Silver-plated Spoon. He had a difficult, to put it mildly, relationship with his father and grandfather. Of his grandfather he wrote:

In the midst of all this magnificence my grandfather lived a completely lonely and austere life. He had no contemporaries or friends of his own and most of the people who came to stay were cousins or other relatives. He had very little time for human beings and rarely spoke.

A somewhat different picture emerges from his Royal Society biographical memoir written by Peter Chalmers Mitchell. However, this one does come with a caveat. The 11th Duke, as President, and Mitchell, as Secretary, were in cahoots for over 30 years in running the Zoological Society and Mitchell was a brilliant publicist.

By disposition the Duke was a rather old-fashioned country gentleman, not fond of company, but taking his pleasure in fishing, shooting, natural history and estate management. Neither hunting nor racing had any attraction for him… In politics the Duke, originally a Liberal, passed over to the Conservative side through Liberal-Unionism, but maintained the traditions of his family by allowing the fullest scope of opinion to others. It was the good fortune of the present writer to be closely associated with him for nearly forty years, directly in connexion with the Zoological Society and zoological affairs, but incidentally in many other respects. He has never known any one more modest about his wide attainments and unusual ability, with a greater sense of duty to his country and to his King, or more conscientiously resolved to accept the responsi­bilities of his wealth and position. He was courteous, almost deferential to every one, and the kindest of friends. 

How the exploration of eastern Asia paid for by the Duke came about I do not know but it would appear that Oldfield Thomas was a driving force (he served on the Council of the Zoological Society). It was clearly not simply a single expedition since various people took part over different periods. I have also not found out why or how the leader and various members were chosen. It ran from 1904 until 1911 and concentrated on mammals. A further complication is that this enterprise overlapped with the Clark expedition of 1908-1909 in northern China. That was led and funded by Robert Sterling Clark, with specimens going to the U.S.A. The complication is that Arthur de Carle Sowerby (1885-1954) worked on both.

Oldfield Thomas
The leader of the Bedford exploration was the American, Malcolm Playfair Anderson (1879-1919). The intention seems to have been collecting for Oldfield Thomas at the Natural History Museum in London, then known, of course, by that awful title, British Museum (Natural History). Sowerby was involved in 1908. Francis (Frank) Kingdon-Ward (1885-1958), a botanical collector described as one of Anderson’s assistants, was involved in a trip through western China in 1909-1910 with Dr J.A.C. Smith, also described by Thomas as Anderson’s assistant.

Thomas described the mammalian finds and new species in a number of papers. In a paper to the Zoological Society in 1911 he explained some of the history of the whole affair:

After the departure of his assistants, Dr. J.A.C. Smith and Mr. Kingdon Ward, down the Yang-tze, with the remarkable collection of mammals which formed the subject of paper No. XIII of the present series, Mr. Malcolm Anderson worked on by himself from September 1910 to the end of March 1911, when he brought back to Shanghai the series on which the present paper is based. 
During this period he explored a number of localities in Western Sze-chuan and N. Yunnan, and has been rewarded by finding a considerable and quite unexpected number of species additional to those previously sent…  
To our great loss and regret Mr. Anderson now proposes to give up the arduous life of the field collector, and this is therefore the last paper to be written on his collections for the Duke of Bedford’s Exploration of Eastern Asia. On this account it is suitable to five a few words of appreciation for the manner in which he has risen to the opportunity afforded by our President’s [i.e. the 11th Duke of Bedford] continued generosity. 
From the commencement of the work in 1904 to the sending home of this last valuable collection in 1911 Mr. Anderson has worked for the Exploration with superb enthusiasm and success, and in the extent to which his collections have revolutionized our knowledge of an extended part of the earth’s surface he has made a record which, so far as I know, has never been equalled… 
In turn Mr. Anderson has visited and collected in Japan and its islands, both the small southern ones and the large northern Hokkaido and Saghalien, Korea, N. China and Mongolia, Shen-si, Shan-si, Kansu, Sze-chwan and N. Yunnan, his collecting-localities being dotted through all the previously most unexplored parts of this little-known area. 
Over 2700 mammals have been collected, besides many birds and, as is natural, a large number of novelties have been found among them.

I will write about what I have found on Anderson, Smith, Kingson-Ward and Sowerby in my next post.

I am, as I shall suggest in the other articles in this series, doubtful of any involvement of the Zoological Society of London. I suspect the American, Anderson, conflated the Natural History Museum in London with the Zoological Society of London since the Duke of Bedford who paid for the whole thing was President of the latter at the time. Anderson may have seen the Duke at the Society's offices in connexion with the eponymous Exploration. It is clear that Anderson was working de facto for Oldfield Thomas at the Museum.


Chalmers Mitchell P. 1941. Herbrand Arthur Russell. Duke of Bedford. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 3, 499-502

John, Duke of Bedford. 1959. A Silver-plated Spoon. London: Cassell (1960, The Reprint Society)

Thomas O. 1912. The Duke of Bedford’s Zoological Exploration of Eastern Asia.—XV. On mammals from the provinces of Sze-chwan and Yunnan, Western China. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (1912), 127-141

UPDATED 30 July 2019

Friday, 3 May 2019

Where the Lion Trod. C.H. Keeling. Zoo history - a new re-publication of the 1984 book, edited by John Adams for the Bartlett Society

My old friend, Clinton Keeling (1932-2007), after a series of misfortunes, some of which it has to be said, were of his own making, reinvented himself as a historian of British zoos*. Beginning in 1984 he produced a series of booklets over the next 19 years with particular attention to a number to zoos that had long been closed. There were two problems why these booklets remain relatively unknown. The first was that they were self-published as typewritten cyclostyled sheets and so never reached conventional publishing and retailing channels. The second was that their content was not obvious from the title (e.g. Where the Leopard Lazed, Where the Macaw Preened, Where the Penguin Plunged). The booklets were known to very few people and the numbers sold must have been very small. Those surviving in circulation must also have dwindled. I suspect the few that I had in the 1980s got bundled with similarly-bound reports and ended in that open-ended receptacle in my office that was sooner or (rarely) later the final resting place of A4-sized documents received from government departments.

The Bartlett Society, which Clin founded in 1984 for zoo history enthusiasts, has made the brave decision to republish the first of Clin’s books, Where the Lion Trod, but this time as hardback. Brave because the information it contains is dated, not surprisingly since sources of information were far harder to access in the 1980s, and brave because it is difficult to predict whether such a venture would be other than a financial drain.

Zoo histories come as two sorts. The first sort which look outwards are produced by social historians and tell you all about the milieu in which the zoo operated, its supposed social significance and why everything is all down to colonialism. The second tell you a lot about the animals kept, the people who set them up and something about the layout and architecture. Clin’s books fall firmly into the latter category; the first sort would have had him foaming at the mouth. His prejudices, both about how animals were kept and should be kept, and about the world in general, shine through so that those who never spent time in his company will get some idea of his diatribes against those who ran zoos in Britain, his loathing of popular culture and his hatred of ‘The Great British Public”.

Clin’s research and musings covered twenty extinct collections/zoos dating from the 13th century (the menagerie in the Tower of London) until 1959 (the date of closure of Maidstone Zoo). Various chapters consider, for example, the long-gone zoos in Liverpool, Manchester before Belle Vue, Edinburgh before the present Edinburgh Zoo, Hull (where a pub still recalls the zoo that closed in 1862), Southport, Cardiff, Halifax, Oxford, Sheringham and Southend.

The original format has been followed so that this hardback reprint bears a striking resemblance to the original typed version. I feel that was an error since I had the feeling of reading a dissertation for a degree rather than a published book. The editor has also added a few notes of explanation or correction as well as a list of known species kept at each establishment; the latter I finds adds little.

I must end with this paragraph on Maidstone Zoo (1934-1959) and its owner, the brewer Sir Garrard Tyrwhitt-Drake (1881-1964):

Sir Garrard was nothing if not a character. When I met him I almost did a double-take in amazement, so astonishing was his likeness to Charlie Chaplin. He invited me into the manor, gave me a glass of beer and after talking to me for a time said ”Hmmm, you know a bit about animals”, which I took to be praised indeed. Then suddenly he said “Well I must ask you to go now Mr Keeling—I want my lunch!” And that was that.

You can buy the book from the Bartlett Society here.


*Those who knew Clin Keeling will realise I risk his posthumous wrath. He never called a zoo a zoo, always a ‘zoological gardens’. I also visit the bot in Hong Kong and also, on occasion, the bot in Edinburgh and the bot at Kew.