Great Mormon Butterfly in Hong Kong

AJP photographed this Great Mormon Butterfly (Papilio mormon) in the garden in May. He has seen large numbers of this large butterfly (around 5 inches -125 mm) this year.

Females are highly polymorphic. In some parts of southern Asia the females mimic toxic butterflies. The fact that the males have the choice of a number of different female forms within an area seems to have been responsible for their common name of ‘mormon’.

Great Mormons figured in one of the key papers on mimicry and its evolution. Ian Thornton (1926-2002) then Reader in Zoology in the University of Hong Kong sent specimens to Liverpool for breeding experiments and was a co-author of the paper with Sir Cyril Clarke (1907-2000) and Philip Shepherd (1921-1976) which was published in Transactions of the Royal Society in 1968.

I only discovered that Ian Thornton had been involved in work on the genetics of the Great Mormon when writing this note. I then recalled something odd about the department of zoology in those days. I never recall a single internal seminar. External visitors and talks by a host of distinguished scientists calling in Hong Kong, yes; but talks by staff and PhD students on what they were doing, no.

Clarke CA, Sheppard PM, Thornton IWB. 1968. The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L.. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 254 37–89. doi:10.1098rstb.1968.0013

ANIMALS Magazine. Back to the 60s

 

ANIMALS magazine was launched in January 1963 by Purnell & Sons as a weekly. The editor was John Paget Chancellor (1927-2014) but television personalities were used as ‘influencers’ then as now, and the film maker Armand Denis was listed as Editor-in-Chief. For those not around then, Armand and Michaela Denis produced and presented On Safari, a hugely popular programme on BBC television in the 1950s. Not content with a celebrity editor-in-chief, Chancellor assembled  a collection of well-known naturalists and scientists as ‘patrons’ and ‘advisory editors’ (Julian Huxley, Solly Zuckerman, (13th) Duke of Bedford, Bernhard Grzimek, Gavin Maxwell, Peter Scott, Gerald Durrell, Nicholas Guppy, Alan Moorehead, Niko Tinbergen).

As well as articles ANIMALS ran extracts of books. It had an important role in drawing attention in Britain to Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, which it began publishing extracts soon after its launch and only four months after the book was first published in the USA.

At the time of its launch as a colour glossy, Purnells were in their heyday. However, it seems that ANIMALS was, by the mid-60s, not doing well; it is said that it ran at a loss for its four years with Purnell. In 1967 the magazine was bought by one of the assistant editors, Nigel Degge Wilmot Sitwell (1935-2017), who changed it to a monthly and cut the costs of production. Then in 1974 he changed the title to WILDLIFE. The magazine was sold to Reader’s Digest in 1978, then via another publisher to become BBC WILDLIFE which is still extant but which I have not seen for years. Nigel Sitwell, whom I got to know slightly 30-odd years ago, moved to other publishing, travel and conservation interests in Antarctica and the Galapagos.

Copies of ANIMALS are difficult to search for, given the title. It was, however, an important popular publication of its time and well worth reading as a source of what was going on in the world of animals and conservation in the 1960s.

Feral Gecko Populations in British University Buildings

Escapes and deliberate releases have been responsible for the occurrence of feral populations non-native amphibians and reptiles in Britain, ranging from Midwife Toads to Aesculapian Snakes. Tropical and sub-tropical species sometimes escape in heated, indoor accommodation but rarely in sufficient numbers to produce a breeding population. However, it does happen, as a recent paper illustrates.

Two feral populations of gecko have been found in buildings at the University of Hull and the University of Nottingham. The date when they were first noticed seems to be the late 1990s-early 2000s in Hull and the 1970s in Nottingham. Both populations have been identified as Hemidactylus turcicus, the Mediterranean House Gecko or Turkish Gecko, which, as its names implies is found in countries bordering virtually the entire Mediterranean coast. It is, like many geckos, nocturnal. However, like some others in the genus, it is now to be found found in other parts of the world where it has been introduced, probably in shipments of goods. It is, for example, found in the USA and Mexico and said to be abundant in Florida.

Molecular genetic studies suggested the Nottingham population is derived from a single or very few founding individuals. Those studied from the Hull population showed greater genetic diversity, suggesting a larger number in the founder population and/or evolution in situ.

The authors speculate that the two populations were established by individuals being kept by people as part of research projects. It may be that the individuals involved are known—or could be guessed—at one site or the other but ‘no names, no pack drill’ may apply.

In Britain, it is difficult to imagine sub-tropical or tropical reptiles becoming established in buildings, other than in those heated all day, every day, in the winter in the decades before the 1970s. Laboratory buildings were often freezing cold in vacations and at weekends—far too cold for most reptiles to survive let along breed and thrive. 

Just in case anybody is asking, have I left feral populations behind in the buildings I once kept reptiles? I do not think so but their food supply was a different matter: crickets, locusts and fruitflies and flour beetles were some of the escapees. In the one building still standing, the crickets may still be there.

Da Silva S-M, Maka A, Hartman T, Valero KW, Gilbert E. 2024. Two established introduced populations of the synanthropic gecko Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758) in England. Herpetology Notes 17, 407-410 

Coucals Taking the Sun on a Hot Day in Hong Kong

AJP saw these Greater Coucals (Centropus sinensis) in the garden on a hot day last week. Resident in Hong Kong they are known to sunbathe, particularly in the mornings. More often they are spotted clambering around shrubs or on the ground in search of food, animal and vegetable. They make short flights but always seeming to have difficulty in doing so.

For decades these birds wered known as crow-pheasants since they do resemble both a crow and a pheasant. However they are cuckoos but not brood parasitic ones, building a well-hidden nest in May and June.

They were one heavily trapped for sale in Chinese medicine. We found noose traps, illegal then as now, which used a bent twig as the spring, set along a path in the New Territories in January 1968

A noose trap set on a track (which must now be part of the Maclehose Trail)
January 1968

.

Terrapins in the Algarve. A North American Field Guide Would Have Been Useful

I was hoping we would see Spanish Terrapins (Mauremys leprosa) and European Pond Terrapins (Emys orbicularis) when we were in Portugal in early April. We did but in the Algarve we also saw very large numbers of North American sliders (Trachemys scripta) in a freshwater lake behind the saline lagoon and beach at Quinta do Lago (part of the Ria Formosa National Park). I spent ages looking through the photographs in order to try and identify what we had been seeing basking in the spring sunshine. I then found a paper from 2018 which describes an extensive survey of the National Park, which extends along the coast of the Algarve, done between 2011 and 2013. Over that period the most common species was M. leprosa (79% of all captures). Then came E. orbicularis (12%) with introduced North American species on 9%. That paper clearly demonstrated for the first time that the introduced terrapins were breeding. I also discovered that the lake, surrounded by a golf course and holiday apartments, is used as a place to release rescued native terrapins. Whether that lake is typical of other freshwater lakes and ponds of the Ria Formosa National Park I do not know but it was clear to us that introduced sliders vastly outnumbered M. leprosa while only a few E. orbicularis were evident. 

The authors of the 2018 paper raised the alarm in view of evidence that North American sliders compete for food and basking sites with E. orbicularis. Throughout its range E. orbicularis is decreasing in numbers and is now classified as Near Threatened in the IUCN Red List. The question is if and will anything be done to control the number of introduced terrapins in Portugal.

I should point out that I am following British terminology for freshwater chelonians in using ‘terrapin’ for all these species, rather than the North American ‘turtle’. However, to complicate matters, Emys orbicularis was often called the European Pond Tortoise. ‘Spanish Terrapin’ is also misleading since the species also occurs in North Africa. In Portugal and elsewhere, Mediterranean Pond Terrapin is also used as a name for M. leprosa. 

We also travelled inland and on one reservoir and a slow-moving river saw only the two native species.

I am puzzled by the presence in the same locations of E. orbicularis and M. leprosa, as I was at Butrint in Albania, where E. orbicularis and the Balkan Terrapin (Mauremys rivulata) live side by side. Are those pairs of species not in competition? And if not why not?

Sliders in Europe represent either the declining remnants of the once enormous trans-Atlantic trade in ‘baby terrapins’ in the north or a thriving feral  population in the south. As the baby terrapins grew, they were released by owners unable to house them. However, before that stage was reached only when word spread on how to rear them successfully. Until then virtually all died from being kept too cold and from being given unsuitable food deficient in vitamins and calcium. However, when kept properly the cute baby grows very rapidly.

The sliders we saw represent the two phases of the trade. Initially—and apart from ones captured in the wild for the dealers selling to amateur herpetologists—the ones which came in were Red-eared Sliders (Red-eared terrapins, Trachemys scripta elegans). The late 1950s saw the start of the mass trade in Britain. What we didn’t know was that these terrapins were being bred on ‘turtle farms’ in the southern USA and that they were fed the waste from chicken carcasses. It did not take all that long for Salmonella from the chicken and contaminated water to make its presence felt, both in the USA and in Europe. Eventually that trade was banned. But then a second wave, I think also coinciding with the mutant ninja turtle craze, this time of another subspecies of slider, brought the Yellow-bellied Slider (Trachemys scripta scripta) to pet shops. It was these two forms that were present at Quinta do Lago. In contrast to 2011-2013 data when Red-ears predominated (98% of the sliders), Yellow-bellied were as least as common, if not slightly more so, than  the Red-ears, as would be expected. 

Of the sliders I could see clearly, I did not spot any obvious hybrids between the two subspecies. This could mean that many of the large terrapins are of the original stock or it could indicate assortative mating.

The EU banned the import, sale, breeding or exchange of all forms of T. scripta in 2015, a position maintained in Britain after Brexit.

Martins BH, Azevedo F, Teixeira J. 2018. First reproduction report of Trachemys scripta in Portugal Ria Formosa Natural Park, Algarve. Limnetica, 37, 61-67. DOI: 10.23818/limn.37.06

An Undesirable Alien in Deepest Ayrshire: New Zealand Flatworm

 

SJP realised that the worm in the topsoil of the allotment was not the usual earthworm. It was though a different sort of worm, one which had us trying to remember all we could about platyhelminths, a phylum which last impinged upon our cerebral cortices 60 years ago. It is a New Zealand Flatworm, now named Arthurdendyus triangulatus, an invasive species that first appeared in Britain in the early 1960s, probably in the soil of imported plants. It has spread throughout the country and seems well suited to the damp (wet, to be honest) soil of Ayrshire. I am told it is particularly prevalent on some allotments because of a communal composting scheme that was in operation in the past.

It was put into the category ‘invasive’ because of the damage it can do to earthworm numbers and therefore soil quality and fertility. It apparently feeds almost exclusively on earthworms which are killed and digested outside the body. The flatworm wraps itself around the earthworm, extrudes its pharynx which produces digestive enzymes, and then ingests the resultant slurry (paté?) of earthworm. Earthworm populations may be reduced by 20%. As well as in soil it lives in damp laces above ground, around the bases of plants, under pots, stones, logs etc. In spring they lay egg capsules about the size of a blackcurrant. Each holds 5-8 young which hatch after two months.

It is forbidden under the Wildlife and Countryside Act(s) to distribute New Zealand Flatworms which means that any found have to be killed and not released alive.

This species was first described by Arthur Dendy (see here and here) as Geoplana triangulata in 1896. The eponymous genus Arthurdendyus was erected by Hugh D. Jones in 1999.

The mucus is said to be a skin irritant. However SJP survived unscathed from wrangling this most undesirable alien.

The Heart of the Salamander: Science in the Making 1940-41

The Royal Society sometimes publishes papers from the archives under the heading Science in the Making. A recent one certainly drew my attention since it is a letter from 1940 concerning a paper and people I have written about previously. It provides an amusing insight into how papers were refereed and of why the whole business of selecting scientific papers for publication by peer review is so fraught with difficulty, why mistakes are often made and how good papers are sometimes rejected while utter garbage gets published sometimes, sadly, by what were/are highly-regarded journals. Before I digress into a tirade on the decline in standards of present-day refereeing and editing, back to the paper in hand.

The letter from the archives was written from Trinity College, Cambridge on 28 December 1940 by Carl Frederick Abel Pantin FRS (1899 –1967) of the Department of Zoology. From the letter’s content it is obvious that he had been asked by John David Griffith Davies (1899-1953, the Assistant Secretary from 1937 until 1946) to provide a second opinion on a paper submitted for publication. Griffith Davies was trying to keep the publication system working as war took its toll and he was running from pillar to post moving records to safety, compiling a register of scientists for the war effort and running the London operation. The first refereewas Alan Nigel Drury FRS (later Sir Alan) (1889-1980) who recommended publication but that the introduction should be shortened. Here I declare a personal interest since after Sir Alan retired for the first time from the Lister Institute and having established a blood transfusion and blood products system during the war, he was persuaded to become head of the pathology department at the then new Institute of Animal Physiology at Babraham. After his second retirement he still kept a close interest in the people and work of the Institute. Although he was then 88 and frail, on my last day at Babraham before leaving for Ayr he asked to be picked up from home and brought to my lab in order to wish me well.

The paper in question was The Heart of the Salamander (Salamandra salamandra, L.), with Special Reference to the Conducting (Connecting) System and its Bearing on the Phylogeny of the Conducting Systems of Mammalian and Avian Hearts by Francis Davies (1897-1965) and Eric Thomas Brazil Francis (1900-1993) of the Departments of Anatomy and Zoology, respectively of the University of Sheffield.

Francis Davies

Eric Francis

Pantin’s first criticism was that the historical introduction was far too long. ETBF was following the tradition set by his former professor of zoology at Reading, Francis Joseph Cole FRS (1872-1959) with regard to immensely long histories of the subject of the publication. Pantin and Drury were right.

On the second point, that the paper needed to refer the paper to somebody from a human anatomy department, since the work would only be of interest to anatomists, was wrong. This anatomical paper, with as much physiology as the authors could do at the time, was about a physiological and evolutionary question. In short, as the title states it was about the conducting system within the heart responsible for the co-ordinated contraction of the heart muscle. In mammals and birds there are specialised muscular fibres within cardiac muscle which conduct the signal to contract from the pacemaker in the sino-atrial node to all parts of the ventricle. However, Davies and Francis could found no trace of these tracts, like the Bundle of His, or the smaller Purkinje fibres, in mammals. Thus they concluded that the wave of contraction that passes through the amphibian heart is the result of one contracting cardiac muscle cell setting off its neighbour, as in a line of falling dominos.

The implications for the way the heart works has very great implications in terms of the force of contraction and maximum heart rate that can be achieved. The wave of contraction is slow in amphibians compared with the rapid conduction to all parts of the heart in mammals and birds. In turn, the rate of metabolism of amphibians and reptiles is constrained making them ‘slow animals’ as opposed to the mammals and birds which have higher metabolic rates. There has been some suggestion that the development of specialised conducting fibres may also be related to the complete separation of the two sides of the heart in mammals and birds since in crocodilians, which have a full septum between the ventricles, there appears to be the rudiments of a conducting system. Davies and Francis later turned their attention to the crocodilian conducting system but that is a story for another time.

Despite Pantin missing the point completely, the paper was then sent to a third referee of the background Pantin suggested,  James Thomas Wilson FRS (1861-1945), Emeritus Professor of Anatomy in Cambridge. Although he was ill and felt unable to provide a detailed report, he considered it ‘a work of considerable interest and importance’. Wilson was a good choice. He had a reputation as a comparative anatomist with considerable knowledge of monotremes and the evolution of mammals gained while working at the University of Sydney.

The Davies and Francis paper was published in Philosophical Transactions, with a historical introduction that was still too long. It, together with later work on crocodilians, is still widely quoted since Davies and Francis were onto something of major importance in the evolution of vertebrates (Pantin was very much and invertebrates man) and of how animals work and why they work the way they do. The working of the heart, sadly only possible to address by exercises in armchair physiology, is also vital to understanding how dinosaurs managed to work at all.

The letters and reports from Drury, Pantin and Wilson certainly provide a snapshot from 1940 of science in the making.