Tuesday, 12 April 2016

Natasha du Breuil and Valentine Rodolphe Burkhardt. Hong Kong Naturalists. Part 2. Burkhardt

Since this article appeared Peter Burkhardt, Valentine Burkhardt's grandson, has been in contact with me and has provided further information, photographs, drawings and paintings, for which I am most grateful. Some of that material is now shown below in a modified version of the original article. In addition, Stephen Blackmore contacted me to recall his meeting with Colonel Burkhardt as a schoolboy in Hong Kong in 1965.

Nearly 50 years ago, I recall that we were saddened to read that the man who had written short articles under the heading of Chinese Fact and Fancy for Hong Kong’s Sunday Post-Herald under the pseudonym ‘Pioneer’ had died. I did not think then that I would find myself writing about him now.

The British Army has, over the years, both produced and contained a number of individuals who have contributed to knowledge of the natural and man-made worlds. One such individual was Valentine Rodolphe Burkhardt. His amateur activities spanned sinology, entomology and philately which were carried out in parallel with his professional duties, often in military intelligence, as one the the Army’s China specialists in the early decades of the 20th Century. Information on his role in major events is still coming to light as military historians work their way through archived material.



Colonel V.R. Burkhardt DSO, OBE taken about 1945
from the book jacket of Confessions of Custard

When I began to look into the life and work of Valentine Burkhardt using Google searches, the London Gazette, Ancestry and Findmypast and the archives of The Times and the South China Morning Post, I did not realise that somebody had trodden much of the same path. A short biography had been published in 1995 in a book of letters from him to the young daughters of a fellow officer written between 1929 and 1932.

From these various sources I have been able to find a considerable amount about this man who shared his knowledge in Hong Kong in the 1950s and 60s. Because of errors in the spelling of the Burkhardt name by census enumerators and shipping clerks and further errors caused by poor transcription of the hand-written data, I have, by using the search tricks of the trade of the family historian been able to add more information to that in published family trees. It has, however, proved more difficult to determine his antecedents because of his Swiss/American (or was it Swiss/American-British?) parentage and lack of documentation.

Valentine Burkhardt was born in Eccles, Lancashire on 21 December 1884, the son of Louis Rodolphe Burkhardt (a Swiss national)(1859-1929) and Annie Claudia Caldwell (1856-1921) who was born in Charleston, South Carolina. I can find no legal registration of his birth in England, the place of birth being shown only in later census returns. However, he was baptised in the Church of England at St James, Hope, Manchester, which is close to Eccles Station, on 1 February 1885. His father’s occupation is shown as ‘merchant’. In later documents, Louis is shown as a ‘silk inspector’ or ‘silk merchant’.

At the 1871 Census, Annie Caldwell was living with her mother, Virginia Caldwell, aged 45, a widow, and four siblings together with a Church of England clergyman, shown as a visitor, and three servants at 13 Watts Road, Tavistock, Devon. There is a record of a Virginia Caldwell, born on 19 February 1828 in Charleston, applying for a U.S. passport in November 1861 in New York for herself, five children and two servants. Although I can find no trace of Virginia Caldwell in the 1881 Census, the Caldwell family appears to have moved permanently to U.K. because in 1891, Virginia Caldwell was living at Edinburgh House, Bellevue Road, Clevedon, Somerset with her grandson Valentine Burkhardt, aged 6, two servants and two visitors. She died in Bristol in 1889 at a reported age of 73. According to the death notice of her daughter, she was the widow of Robert Caldwell of Charleston, South Carolina.

Louis and Annie Burkhardt seem to have had a peripatetic existence. Their first son, Robert Harold, was born in Marseilles, France on 17 July1880, Valentine in 1885 in Lancashire. However, Louis became a resident of  Shanghai which may have had something to do with Valentine being drawn to study Chinese while at a fairly early stage in his Army career. A Who’s Who for Shanghai in 1904 shows L.R. Burkhardt at 2 Hongkong Road. The Burkhardt’s are shown leaving London by sea for Marseilles in September 1916 with the future destination shown as China. His occupation is shown as ‘silk inspector’; both are listed as Swiss nationals.

Annie Burkhardt was in England in 1901, living 10 Royal Park, Bristol with three domestic servants; Louis, presumably, was in Shanghai. Valentine, then aged 16, was at school at Clifton College. Earlier in 1896, an advertisement appeared in the Western Daily Press of 1 February 1896: at the Victoria Rooms in Bristol Mr Ernest Young, vocalist and reciter, would be assisted by Master Val Burkhardt, reciter. I am certain that no junior officer would have reminded the then Colonel Burkhardt of this appearance on the stage.

It was in 1901 that an event occurred that must have had a devastating effect on the Burkhardt family. Newspaper throughout Britain carried the story as it unfolded. The eldest son, Robert Harold Burkhardt (who was a pupil at Dean Close School in Cheltenham in 1891), was arrested for the theft of two £5 notes (approximately £1000 today). At the time he was a 2nd Lieutenant in the 3rd Militia Battalion of the Royal Welsh Fusiliers; he had been in the army, it was said for six months, although I can find no notice to that effect in the London Gazette; I also do not know if, in a militia battalion, he was in full-time or part-time training at the time. A fellow officer had left an envelope in the letter rack of the officer’s mess containing £11 3 shillings to pay his mess bill (there must have been some serious drinking to get to that amount); it was addressed to the Mess President at Crownhill Barracks, Plymouth. The police were informed when it was realised the envelope was missing. Bank of England £5 notes were large with black lettering on white paper; they were the currency of the very rich and as such were not often seen in circulation. The first £5 note I saw belonged to my grandfather; it was very impressive and worth a lot of money when the average wage was £7 per week. 

A police superintendent in Plymouth traced one of the notes to Bristol; as I said their use in everyday life was unusual and you can bet that some bank clerk had to record the numbers on the notes passing through their hands each day. Robert Burkhardt had used it to pay for something, and was traced by the police. He admitted his guilt and was placed under arrest at Crownhill Barracks. However, eighteen days later he absconded (the sentries were soon put on a charge) and disappeared. The manhunt made the newspapers throughout the country. His mother, Annie, then contacted the police to say that her son was in Birmingham; on his mother’s advice he surrendered to the Chief Constable of Bristol who travelled to Birmingham to re-arrest him personally.

At a court-martial, his barrister, a Mr Percy Pearce, said Burkhardt was an only son (wrong but defence counsel can get desperate) who was only twenty and who had ‘been led away by the external charms of a fast life, and becoming financially embarrassed yielded to sudden temptation’. The sentence was one year in prison and to be cashiered from the Army.

The Western Daily Press was on hand to report his arrival in Exeter for transfer to the (civilian) Devon County Gaol:

     …The time of his arrival at St David’s, however, was not known even among the officials at the station, and though a number of persons were in the station at 12.42 when the 10.40 am, from Millbay Station (Plymouth) steamed in, none were aware that the train contained Lieutenant Burkhardt and his escort (Captain J.L. Loch, reserve of officers, and Staff-Sergeant Resber, orderly room clerk, both of the 3rd R.W.F.. The prisoner was very pale, but was smartly dressed in a brown suit, with drab overcoat, and he wore a hard felt hat. Without delay he was conveyed in a cab to the County Gaol, where he was handed over to the Governor to serve his sentence.

Robert Burkhardt sailed for the U.S.A. from Liverpool on 20 June 1903. There he married and had a daughter in 1909 and a son in 1911. We worked as a clerk in Chicago. He died on 1 April 1918 aged 37; his wife died a year later.

Valentine must have had a tough time at school in 1901 during publicity surrounding the arrest, escape, trial and imprisonment of his brother. He entered the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, on 29 January 1902; his nationality is shown as Swiss, so at some time later he must have been naturalized (his brother is shown as of British nationality while at school in 1891). At entry he was 23rd out of 80 in the order of merit. When he left, and was commissioned into the Royal Field Artillery, on 23 December 1903, he was 23rd out of 83; he received the prize for freehand drawing, a talent that emerged in his articles in the Hong Kong Sunday Post-Herald and in his letters to the two girls.

In 1912 Lieutenant Burkhardt married Edith Elspeth Joan Ewing. In 1913 he was sent as a language student to Peking* and qualified as a First Class Interpreter in Mandarin (the London Gazette had him down as a student of Russian). He, with his wife and daughter, returned on P&O’s Namur arriving at Plymouth on 28 November 1914 from Shanghai (where his parents were living). His daughter, Margery Elspeth Alice, had been born in Peking on 9 November 1913. The family’s address was shown as Claydene, Edenbridge, Kent, the house of his wife’s family.

Thanks to the biography drawn up from army records, we know what he did in the First World War. First he was a Staff Captain in the 28th Division in France and Belgium. In 1915, he was sent as Deputy Assistant Adjutant and Quartermaster General (i.e. administration and discipline) of 42nd (East Lancashire) Division to the Mediterranean Expeditionary Force. In December 1915 he was sent to Gallipoli, in the acting rank of Major, to assist in the arrangements for the evacuation of British, French and ANZAC forces. The evacuation, brilliantly planned and executed with deception, complete surprise and total secrecy was the only successful aspect of the Gallipoli debacle; Burkhardt was mentioned in despatches on his departure on 1 January 1916. On 12 January 42nd Division arrived in Egypt and took part in the Suez and Sinai campaigns. A son, John Alistair, was born in 1916.

In February 1917 Burkhardt was part of an advance Staff party heading for France to prepare for the arrival there of his Division. He reached the Front in April where then rejoined the establishment of the Royal Artillery from the staff. In his obituary in the South China Sunday Post-Herald, J.R.Jones (see my post on Natasha) (identified as the writer in the biography of Burkhardt referred to above) stated that he had first met Burkhardt when they commanded neighbouring batteries on the Somme in the winter of 1915-16. I suspect a lapse of memory on Jones’s part; that meeting, according to the records would have been in the winter of 1916-17. He was awarded the D.S.O. (gazetted 21 June), again mentioned in despatches on 6 July and confirmed in the rank of Major. During his time in France and Belgium, 42nd Division was involved in the Third Battle of Ypres, known, simply, to, and etched into the memory of, participants and succeeding generations as Passchendaele.

Burkhardt then began the regular pattern of alternating staff and regimental appointments. Because of his thorough knowledge of the French language he served from January 1918 until October 1919 as a liaison officer with the French army and then with the British Mission at the Headquarters of Marshal Foch. He kept a diary in 1918 which is a fascinating account of his role, of the German advance, repulsion and final capitulation, and of the arrangements for the armistice. The diary, kept by the family, has some trenchant comments on some of his brother officers and some of the French commanders. It ends with glowing tributes to his three personal servants who interchanged jobs as batman, chauffeur and groom. One had enlisted at the age of 51 in 1914, another with six children at 42 in 1915. VRB was again mentioned in despatches in December 1918 and awarded the Légion d’Honneur 5th Class and the Croix de Guerre.

From December 1918 until 1920 he painted a series of 21 water colours in a large sketchbook during the occupation of the Rhine Provinces. Three of these are shown below:


The Rhine at Spire

The Rhine at Worms

Oberwesel

Between 1920 and 1923, he was a member of Commission of Control in Germany. In the meantime, The Times of 6 June 1921 carried the notice that his mother, Annie Claudia Burkhardt of 8a Peking Road Shanghai, had died on 18 May.


Burkhardt photographed in London with First World War medal
ribbons and what appear to be the red tabs of a staff officer

His first substantive role in China began in 1923, as a General Staff Officer Grade 2 in Tientsin. He was Brigade Major in the North China Command. His biography states that he travelled extensively in China before returning to U.K. in 1928. For these services he was appointed O.B.E. (military). His father died in 1929, in Shanghai.

The next four years were spent commanding the 13th Light Battery of the 5th Light Brigade of the Royal Artillery, at Ewshott, near Aldershot, and then at Bulford on Salisbury Plain. It was during those years, 1929-32, that Burkhardt wrote illustrated letters to the young daughters of his second-in-command, Captain “Ack-Ack” Middleton. Even the daughters were known by nicknames, Merrie and Bright, after a song, My Motter, in the immensely popular Edwardian musical comedy, The Arcadians. In order to provide rest for their pregnant mother, the two girls were taken by their father to church parade on Sundays. Afterwards, the officers inspected ‘the lines’ where the mules were kept. The mules were used to pull the guns and limbers. Looking at the photographs from that time we see guns from the Victorian era and it hard to imagine that ten years later the Army would be involved in the relatively hi-tec Second World War. However, I digress. The mules were a mixed lot, not only in genes but also in temperament. The girls’ favourite was ‘Custard’ and they were given rides on her. Custard was as stubborn as…a mule and it took the combined efforts of officers pulling and pushing to get her back to the stable. Obedience on a battlefield and mules just do not seem to go together. Custard by then was too old to pull the guns and was given the lighter job of hauling the reels of signal cable. The girls were much taken by Custard and started writing letters to her. Then they were then greatly surprised to receive letters with cartoons from Custard describing life in the army and the vicissitudes of being a mule with sore knees. The writer and illustrator was Major Burkhardt whom their mother had considered “rather a dull chap”. She soon found, as Merrie explained later, “that he had hidden— at least from her—wit, learning and considerable talents as a draughtsman, on a different level from other Gunner officers trained at ‘the Shop’—the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich”.



In 1963, ‘Ack-Ack’, by now a retired Brigadier, was killed in a car crash. Burkhardt wrote a letter of sympathy to Mrs Middleton from Hong Kong and in an exchange of letters in which the latter mentioned that she still had the letters, Burkhardt replied in 1966, months before he died, “Fancy Custard’s confessions having survived! I was supremely lucky to inherit 13 [Battery] after Ack had breathed his spirit into the Battery. I had nothing to do but to sit back and benefit while devoting myself to juvenile literature. Custard’s confessions were always easier to write after a visit from the children, for their questions provided material for the answers”.

It was these letters that were published in 1995 by Leo Cooper under the title Confessions of Custard. A Military Mule. Letters to Merrie and Bright 1929-1932. Burkhardt was the (very) posthumous author, Merrie, by then Marian A McKenzie Johnston2, provided an introduction and biography of Burkhardt, and Jilly Cooper a Foreword. Burkhardt’s drawings are wonderful.

Burkhardt clearly had time on his hands while in command of his battery. He was I strongly suspect a lonely man. As I traced the comings and goings of his family in the inter-war years, I got the impression that he and his wife lived separate lives and inhabited different worlds. Only when I read the biography compiled by Merrie was the separation, apparently within a short time of the birth of the son, confirmed. However, appearances were kept up, right up to his wife’s funeral. 1930s telephone directories still had his name listed for ‘Claydene’.

The obituary of his son, John, states that he was brought up by his grandmother (i.e. maternal) grandmother in the family home of the Ewings in Kent. His wife, Edith Elspeth Joan, was a socialite, her name appearing the the Court and Social section of The Times throughout the 1920s and 30s. For example, The Times of 2 March 1932 reported: Lady Burgh, Mrs Burkhardt, Miss Burkhardt and Miss Vincent have arrived at the May Fair Hotel for the season. Miss Burkhardt was presented by her mother at the Court of George V; in other words, she was a débutante and had arrived as a suitable potential wife of a member of the aristocracy, however minor. As an aside, it is now hard to imagine that this nonsense was not abolished until 1958.

Mrs Burkhardt’s credentials, along with those of her friends in the minor aristocracy, must have taken a knock, when they were found, as victims of a crime, to have indulged in trade. The Times ran the whole story, from an arrest at Croydon Aerodrome to a plea of guilty at Westminster Police Court. In 1927, a Mrs Elsie Emily Butlin, then aged 22, had got in touch with the secretary of a London club ‘frequented by ladies of some distinction’. As a result she was introduced to Mrs Burkhardt who was dealing in millinery and anxious to find a market for her goods. Mrs Butlin went off with the goods but no money was forthcoming from the London stores with whom Mrs Butlin was said to have contacts. Then she induced Mrs Burkhardt and her friends to invest in a scheme based in Vienna whereby furs would be obtained from the Soviet government at very low prices, brought to London and then sold at a profit of 700-800 percent. In all she extracted £15,000 from Mrs Burkhardt, Lady Burgh and Mrs Victoria Selby Lowndes. In October 1929, Butlin disappeared and although she flew back to Britain several times, the police failed to catch her. Eventually, she pleaded guilty to all the charges. The police appeared to be sympathetic with a detective-sergeant stating that the accused had been married at 18, that her husband had left her soon afterwards for South Africa, that she was of previous good character and from a highly respectable family. Her defence solicitor, in mitigation, said that the prisoner was herself duped by a man called Verney whom she had met in Paris in 1927 in the scheme to sell Russian furs.

The magistrate, in passing sentence, said the sum was considerable (£800,000 in today’s money) and he had no doubt that the prisoner was a very plausible. However, she was still young and ‘felt he could do not less than to sentence her to 12 months’ imprisonment’. Accounts of earlier court appearances suggest that Butlin had claimed some money had been repaid. My impression is that there was sympathy for Elsie Butlin.

In mid-1932 Major Burkhardt was posted to Peking as Military Attaché to the British Legation with the local rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. His daughter, Margery but known by her second name Elspeth and then aged 19, joined him to act as his hostess; she left England on board P&O’s Ranpura on 3 February 1933. The Times of 26 February 1932 noted that Burkhardt ‘has a wide experience of the present troubles in China, as he was employed there as G.S.O.2 and brigade major in the north from 1923 to 1928’. on 10 January 1933, The Times welcomed his substantive promotion to Lieutenant-Colonel. Promotion had been slow after the influx of regular officers in the First World War and the severe run-down of the Army in the 1920s: ‘The promotion of 10 majors in the Royal Artillery to lieutenant-colonel causes welcome advancement for senior captains of 1917 date and subalterns’.

The early 1930s was an interesting time to be in China. The Japanese were expanding their control and extending their military reach; factions within China still jostled for local or central power and the communists were on the rise. General and specific intelligence gathering must have loomed large in the life of the British Legation. I have found reference to three despatches from Burkhardt to the Foreign Office in London1:

14 August 1933. Communist military situation in China
12 January 1934. Conditions in Chahar province [now divided between Inner Mongolia, Beijing and Hebei]
15 January 1934. Strategic aspect of Japanese influence on Mongol border tribes

He completed his term in Peking at the end of 1934. He returned to U.K. with his daughter on 8 August 1935. By the end of 1935, he was back—but only for a short time—to regimental duties; this time commanding 7th Heavy Brigade, R.A. at Changi, Singapore. His daughter again accompanied him; they left Liverpool on the Blue Funnel liner Aeneas (sunk by German bombers off Start Point, Devon in 1940) on 5 October 1935. Places visited during these voyages, to and from the U.K., are the subjects of his pencil sketches in a book that also contained water colours of butterflies (see below):


Tewfik, Suez 27 July 1935

South Gate, Angkor Wat 15 January 1936


At the time of his arrival in Singapore it had already been announced that Lieutenant-Colonel Burkhardt would be G.S.O. Grade 1, British Troops in China (i.e. at headquarters in Hong Kong) from 1936, with the local rank of full Colonel. During this tenure, in 1937, he was promoted substantive Colonel. The military at this time were greatly engaged by the threat of a Japanese invasion. Japan had already infiltrated agents and firth columnists into Hong Kong. There was the question of intelligence in terms of determining Japanese intentions and of what to do if the Japanese invaded; was Hong Kong defensible? Signals intelligence and the breaking of Japanese codes was the third element.

On the last topic I found that Burkhardt gets a mention in Michael Smith’s The Emperor’s Codes (2000). Burkhardt arrived in Hong Kong in the spring of 1936. He found Far East Combined Bureau embroiled in a series of turf wars. The two most senior naval officers were barely speaking to one another, there were divisions between the codebreakers and intelligence gatherers and between the three services, even though they were under the same roof. The bureau was located in a guarded building in the old naval dockyard (near the present Admiralty MTR station). Because it was closely guarded its presence was decidedly not secret.

     In an attempt to break down the “atmosphere of mutual suspicion”. Burkhardt obtained a grant of £1,500 a year from the Army Entertainment Fund. He used the money to set up a series of social gatherings, including a weekly ‘Chinese dinner’ at his own home for all the bureau staff, which “did much to breakdown inter-service rivalries”.

Colonel Burkhardt left his Hong Kong post on 21 March 1939 and retired from the army, for the first time, on 10 May. His departure from Hong Kong was delayed because the ship he was due to leave on (the P&O’s Canton) was damaged in a collision in fog north of Hong Kong; it was in dry dock for three weeks.

His first retirement from the army did not last long. He was recalled to be Military Attaché in China, to what was now the British Embassy in Nanking. His daughter again accompanied him; they left for Shanghai on the P&O liner Viceroy of India on 5 January 1940. He seems to have spent a great deal of time at the consulate in Shanghai. On the announcement of his son’s marriage in 1941 he is described as Military Attaché, Shanghai. It is from J.R. Jones’s account of Burkhardt’s life that we get a clue as to some of his activities:

     …he  indulged in concert with a small group in Shanghai in a kind of Scarlet Pimpernel work in assisting French ex-servicemen and others to leave China and to put them on board British naval vessels to join the Free French Forces.

Now J.R. Jones—that rather mysterious character I referred to in my previous post and a friend of Burkhardt’s since the First World War—was a lawyer in Shanghai. Was he a member of that ‘small group’? My strong suspicion is that he was.

He relinquished the post in China and on 9 May 1941 reverted to retirement pay. He had retired from the army for the second time and returned to U.K. On 21 December 1942, he was declared to be over the age limit for recall to the Army; he was 58. However, his second retirement was also brief for he was employed by the Royal Navy from 1943 to 1946. According to J.R. Jones he helped ‘in the planning of American and British operations in the Far East’. On 3 February 1944, The Times  of 3 February 1944 reported that he was a guest at a British Government lunch held at the Dorchester to welcome a Chinese military mission. Electoral registers show that he was living at the Army & Navy Club, Pall Mall. He retired, for a third time, in 1946, aged 62.

In the meantime, his wife had died and his daughter had changed her name.

In 1939, when the register for wartime rationing and national service was drawn up, Edith Elspeth Joan Burkhardt was living in the Twysden household in Lymington, Hampshire. Eleonora Twysden was a widow. Lady Phyllis Burgh was also there as well as Elspeth Burkhardt. One of those names will be recognised as being one of the victims of the Russian fur confidence trick. By 1941, Mrs Burkhardt was living with Lady Burgh (née Phyllis Goldie the widow of Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Leith, 5th Lord Burgh, 1866-1926) in Aberdeenshire at Mill House, Glenkindle; she died there on 22 March 1943. She was buried ay Markbeech, Kent, in her father’s grave. The Kent & Sussex Courier of 2 April 1943 reported Colonel Burkhardt at the head of a short list of mourners. She left the residue of her assets (£20,000) in trust to her daughter and sister for them to provide funds ‘for provision of radium for the relief of human suffering’.

The London Gazette of 24 August 1943 contained the notice that his daughter described simply as Elspeth Burkhardt of “Claydene” Edenbridge, under Regulation 20 of the Defence (General) Regulations 1939 (concerned with registration of identity) was changing her surname from Burkhardt to that of her late mother, Ewing. Was Burkhardt too Germanic a name to be comfortable with or was she continuing the linking of the name Ewing with the house “Claydene”?

On 4 February 1949, Burkhardt boarded the P&O liner Corfu at Southampton bound for Hong Kong—this time as a civilian and aged 65. It seems he was living with his son and daughter-in-law near Newmarket before he left. His son, John, after Eton, had graduated in veterinary medicine at Trinity College, Dublin in 1940. He was then a lecturer in physiology and histology at the medical school where he pursued his interest in animal reproduction. His PhD in 1944 was on the development of the ovary of the ewe. On one of the first fellowships awarded by the Animal Health Trust, he worked on equine infertility, initially with John Hammond in the School of Agriculture in Cambridge and then with W.C. Miller at the Equine Research Station in Newmarket. In 1950 he set up a specialist equine practice to meet the needs of the Thoroughbred breeders in Yorkshire. In 1967 he established his own stud farm in Ireland. He died in 19843.

In Hong Kong, we know that Burkhardt lived with Natasha Du Breuil whom all sources say he met in Peking before the War. Of his time in Hong Kong, J.R. Jones wrote:

     Not many people knew him personally, but he had his own circle of friends. He was a scholar and shunned publicity and loved seclusion among his books and collections.
     Except for his weekly visit each Thursday to lunch with his friends of the “Tripehounds” and his wanderings in search of local colour and information on the lives and customs of the Chinese people of the Colony, he rarely left his Stanley home.
     He was, however, much at home with the humble folk of the colony from the necromancers to temple guardians while with the boat people, the junkmen, he was almost a member of the family and there was little in their lives with which he was not acquainted.

My curiosity aroused, I wondered who the “Tripehounds” were; some bunch of long-forgotten Old China Hands enjoying lunch together, perhaps. To my surprise I found two references in a Google search. The superb Gwulo had an article explaining who they were and the Captain of H.M.A.S. Sydney, an aircraft carrier, in his report on the doings of his ship, explained, in between expressing concern at the very high incidence of venereal diseases amongst his crew, how he was entertained by the Tripehounds during a visit to Hong Kong in 1954. It turns out that The Tripehounds was the lunch club for the Hong Kong Establishment—an exclusive club within the exclusive Hong Kong Club. The Governor and Colonial Secretary were members as were senior military personnel together with the taipans of the great commercial houses, the hongs. They were called the Tripehounds because they were served tripe every week; not ‘tripe’ in the sense of poor food but tripe, proper tripe, prepared, or dressed, mainly from the reticulum, the second chamber of the bovine stomach. I suspect that tripe was one of those dishes that had a bimodal pattern of consumption in Britain. It was popular amongst the working class because it was cheap and probably eaten by public schoolboys, i.e. the upper classes, because it was a cheap way to feed boarders. Upper-class men always hanker after the bland food they were served at boarding school and tripe would have filled the bill. I trust they followed the tripe with Spotted Dick pudding.

The activity for which Burkhardt was best one was his gathering of information for his three volumes, Chinese Creeds and Customs published by the South China Morning Post in 1953, 1955 and 1958 and reprinted many times, and for the weekly articles on the same written for the Sunday Post-Herald under the nom-de-plume ‘Pioneer’. His own illustrations appear throughout.

He also extended, described and illustrated his father’s collection of Chinese stamps. Album sheets and individual stamps were sold by auction at Spinks in Hong Kong on 13 February 2013. The rarity of the stamps can be judged by the pre-sale estimates. I totted up the lower estimate of lots from the Burkhardt collection in the sale; it came to HK$5,224,000 or £473,000.

Finally, there was his interest in butterflies. According to J.R. Jones, it was a hobby of long standing.

His most active phase in lepidoptery in Britain appears to have been after his final retirement from the army and before his departure to live in Hong Kong. At the back of the Winsor & Newton Sketcher’s note book he used for pencil drawings on his journey from and to the Far East in 1935-1936 and for landscapes in Southern England from 1939 to 1945 (Penang 12 July 1935 to Banstead Manor (now the home of the champion racehorse Frankel) dated 19th April 1945) are six pages with superb water colours of British butterflies he collected and in some cases bred. All show ranges of variations or ‘aberrations’, the collection and cataloguing of which was then the major interest, or obsession of many, amateur lepidopterists.

He was a a member of the South London (now the British) Entomological and Natural History Society from 1946. He published notes on collecting in West Surrey in 1947 in The Entomologist’s Record. He was a member of the US-based but international Lepidopterist’s Society.



The first page of VRB's water colours  from 1942 of variants of British butterflies.
Small Pearl-bordered Fritillary (Boloria silene)
High Brown Fritillary (Argynnis adippe then known as A. cydippe)


Two forms of the Silver-washed Fritillary (Argynnis paphia)


White Admiral (Limenitis camilla, then known as L. sybilla) of the 'nigrina'
variant
Silver-washed Fritillary (A.paphia) captioned Ultra Melanic
The legend reads: Badly damaged left forewing. Kept for breeding only).
Died 10.8.42 after laying a  hundred and fifty eggs. A large proportion
of the larvae failed to survive moulting but eighteen pupated.
Emergence started 15 May 1943 one normal male followed by several
more on subsequent days. On 23rd May an undersized Valezina.
Five Valezina in all emerged.


Variant of the Silver-washed Fritillary
Variants of the Chalk Hill Blue (Polyommatus coridon)
collected around Salisbury in Wiltshire


More variants of the Chalk Hill Blue (Polyommatus coridon)
collected around Salisbury in Wiltshire


A variant of the Small Tortoiseshell (Aglais urticae)
The 'suffusa' form of the Small Copper (Lycaena phlaeus)

The legend to one of VRB’s sketches notes that a specimen of the variant named confluens of the Silver-washed Fritillary (Argynnis paphia) was hunted for three days in the New Forest until eventually being caught by the Reverend J.N. Marcon (John Neville Marcon, 1903-1986). Marcon, in an article published in The Entomologist's record and Journal of Variation in 1975, recalled the abundance of butterflies at certain sites in southern England:

     It was in these places that one would meet Castle Russell, Clifford Wells, Percy Bright cum chauffeur. Major Collier, Woollett, Labouchere, Hyde, Tetley, the two Craskes, Major-Gen. Lipscomb, Stockley, Ford, the Rev. Edwards, Col. Burkhardt and a number of other collectors. Nearly everyone caught something and a real gem was the talk of everyone for the rest of the morning.

When in Britain before the Second World War, VRB was also involved in a tight-knit circle of lepidopterists. Colin Pratt in his History of the Butterflies and Moths of Sussex wrote:

     Shoreham Bank (Mill Hill) was nationally the most famous of all of the Sussex butterfly localities, yet its reputation was gained from just one phenomenon—the numbers and aberrations of the Chalk Hill Blue. The site's 20th century history has been mainly recorded by two giants of the net—R. M. Craske and A. E. Stafford.
     The Chalk Hill Blue. that archetypal downland butterfly. has been nationally celebrated on the Bank since at least the 1820's (Stephens. 1828)—but. after a century and a half of tradition, I have seen more than one aged lepidopterist's eyes fill with tears when discussing the insect's modern history on those hills, now that even scientific collecting is technically banned. Despite the district's early reputation during the late 19th century knowledge of Mill Hill became lost. The slope was then rediscovered by a close band of variety collectors in 1928, although its delights were then kept secret from most enthusiasts until 1955.
     The cream of British variety-hunters collected at Shoreham Bank during its golden age. The following figures are known to have worked the slope from the late 1920's until the start of the Second World War - P. M. Bright and his chauffeur. A. A. W. Buckstone. V. R. Burkhardt, B. H. Crabtree, R. M. Craske and his brother J. C. B. Craske, Kirwin, F. A. Labouchere, C. G. Lipscomb- the Reverend J. N. Marcon. E. de Mornay- S. Morris, A. E. Stafford. J. Tetley. C. Wells. C. de Worms. and L. H. Bonaparte Wyse. Most devotees only visited once or twice a year but the dedicated worked the Bank all day and every day for at least three weeks…

VRB’s water colours show some of the variation in Chalk Hill Blues (Polyommatus coridon) he collected in Salisbury between 11 and 24 August 1942.

When looking up the scientific names of the butterflies he sketched I realised that the pencilled legends on some of the landscapes at the front of his book referred to sites where had collected a particular species. Thus we have ‘Corydon’ (the old name for P. coridon) at Standlynch Down in Wiltshire on 10 September 1939 (one week after the declaration of war) and during his first, short-lived retirement. And ‘Paphia’ for a site of the Silver-washed Fritillary at Oakley North in Hampshire in 1941.




It would appear that he once had an extensive collection of set specimens he had collected in China and Hong Kong but that most of his observations were unpublished. His own paintings illustrated a paper in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Hong Kong Branch (of which J.R. Jones was President) in 1964; in that paper4 he pointed out more of the biology of butterflies than would have been expected from an amateur collector. He had another paper in the same journal that was published posthumously in 1970. That one5, on the breeding of Lamproptera curius in Hong Kong was introduced by J.B. Pickford and J Carey-Hughes (the latter a medical practitioner who died in 2012) and used Burkhardt’s notes. They state that in later years because of storage difficulties he did not keep his set specimens but made water colours of the many species he had caught. They also note that he was in correspondence with N.D. Riley of the Natural History Museum in London. I cannot help wondering where the records and paintings are now.



Burkhardt's watercolours from his 1964 paper

Burkhardt was the driving force behind the publication, Hong Kong Butterflies, produced by the Shell Company of Hong Kong in 1960. It was written by Major J.C.S. Marsh (1923-1991) FRES, RA—another gunner and amateur entomologist.

After the first version of this article appeared Stephen Blackmore wrote to me to say that he had actually met Colonel Burkhardt and Madame du Breuil in 1965 when he lived and was at school in Hong Kong:

     I’ve just come across your piece about Colonel Burkhardt who I met in Stanley in 1965—a meeting that changed the course of my life—in ways that I’ve written about (and will eventually publish). 

     Despite the terrifying age difference (68 years) between us and his initial reluctance to have anything to do with me (a school friend’s mother who lived in Stanley suggested I meet him and organised it) he became immensely animated when we got onto talking about butterflies.  I told him about the records I has been making, mainly on Bowen Road, and he told me that I was a naturalist and that what I was doing was research. At that point in life teachers hadn’t known what to do with me—I was considered to be a bit slow—and I had concluded that I must be very dim.  At the time I though Natasha de Breuil must have been his wife—she made us a pot of tea and was more smiling that the Colonel when I first arrived at their house. She didn’t say very much. However, she did stay and listen to our conversation—I had a feeling that might have been to reassure me (I was quite in awe of him). We all end up laughing a lot when she described that he had reared dozens of atlas moths in their tiny living room. The house seemed a little place compared to the more modern flats we had lived in (which were not very big). He told me where to look for the larvae and I reared a few some years later (in 1969) when we lived in Stanley and by which time he had died.


Steve went on to be become Regius Keeper of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh from 1999 to 2013. We met fairly regularly in the early 2000s but neither of us realised we had lived in Hong Kong at the same time.



Valentine Burkhardt (centre). The venue is the old Luk Kwok Hotel in Wanchai, Hong Kong
(the name is on the tablecloth). Probably circa 1965.
Natasha is at the front left.
The Luk Kwok was famous for its role in The World of Suzie Wong, the novel by
Richard Mason and the 1960 film


Valentine Rodolphe Burkhardt died in Hong Kong on 5 February 1967.

In these two posts I have described the lives of a couple—and they were clearly very much a couple6—who had survived the upheavals of the 20th Century in a country ravaged by wars and warlords, Their biological interests, his in butterflies and hers in aquarium inhabitants and herpetology, were just a facet of their wide knowledge. But much of their lives, and particularly that of Natasha, remains unknown or at least unpublished.


from Chinese Creeds and Customs

I will leave the last word on to J.R. Jones:

     With his books, his butterflies and stamps and his research into Chinese folk lore, Colonel Burkhardt was happy in his secluded world at Stanley. He was, however, a man of great personal charm and amiability. He had the bearing and pride of the distinguished professional solider, one of nature’s true gentlemen, while his gift of languages, his wide knowledge, sense of humour and unusually retentive memory made him a most interesting raconteur.
     No appreciation of Colonel Burkhardt would be complete without a reference to Madame du Breuil, his collaborator and friend who died three months before him. She was the Natasha to whom he dedicated his books on “Chinese Creeds and Customs”. She was also an old resident of Peking, learned in the love of China and a collector of books on China and of Chinese objets d’art…
     As he himself wrote in his introduction to Volume II of Chinese Creeds and Customs, none of this would have been effected without the collaboration of Madame du Breuil, whose interest in the lives of the humbler Chinese has created enduring friendships and the breakdown on the barriers of reticence.
     Colonel Burkhardt and Madame du Breuil were among the last of the old order who lived in and knew Peking and loved China and the Chinese people in the nostalgic era between he two world wars.

-----------------------------------------

*I have used Chinese place names in the transliterated form of the time (Wade-Giles) rather than in Pinyin. Hence Peking is Beijing and Nanking, Nanjing.

1 British documents of foreign affairs: reports and papers from the Foreign Office confidential print.Part II From the First to the Second World War. Series E. Asia. 1914-1939. Editor Ann Trotter, volume 42.

2 Merrie, Mary McKenzie Johnston (1922-2009), was the daughter of Brigadier Alexander Allardyce Middleton and Winifred Salvesen, daughter of a scion of shipping company of Edinburgh and Leith, and himself the pioneer of whaling by the company, Theodore Emile Salvesen. The Salvesen family supplied Edinburgh Zoo with penguins brought back each year by the whaling fleet and assured its pre-eminence in keeping and breeding these birds in captivity; the effect on the penguin population was negligible; that on the whale population was devastating.

3 Obituary in Equine Veterinary Journal 1984 16, 466

4 Hong Kong Butterflies. Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 4, 97-104. 1964

5 A Hong Kong butterfly Lamproptera curius (Fabricius) walkeri (Moore). Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 10, 63-68. 1970

6 The house they lived in at Stanley, 86 Main Street, is now a restaurant. In 2014, the Hong Kong Government proposed listing it for preservation;  the owners were objecting to its listing. I do not know the outcome.


Modified 30 December 2016

Sunday, 28 February 2016

Natasha du Breuil and Valentine Rodolph Burkhardt. Hong Kong Naturalists. Part 1. Natasha

The original article has been modified thanks to information including a photograph from Peter Burkhardt, Valentine Burkhardt's grandson.

In two recent posts I referred to Madame Natasha du Breuil who was active in Hong Kong in the 1950s writing about aquaria and local reptiles**. Thanks to the archives of the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the London Gazette, Wikipedia in Russian and Google Translate, I have been able to find something about her and her remarkable history. In doing so, I uncovered black deeds in China between the two world wars, and her later life in Hong Kong with a retired British army officer who operated in intelligence and special operations in China in the 1930s and early 1940s.

I initially tracked Natasha from a Google search which showed the address of a member of the Lepidopterists’ Society in December 1952. V.R. Burkhardt’s address was shown as: c/o Mme Natasha du Breuil, 6 Basilea, Lyttelton Road, Hong Kong. I recognised Burkhardt as the author of articles on Hong Kong butterflies and soon found that the two lived together and collaborated on publications until their deaths three-months apart in the mid-1960s.

I will start with Madame du Breuil. She was a White Russian antiques dealer who was said by the newspapers to have lived in Peking (Beijing) from 1918. The SCMP of 23 October 1966 contained a notice that she had died, the ‘widow of Le Marquis du Breuil d’Echappere’ on 16 October, aged 75, giving a presumed date of birth of the last quarter of 1890 or 1891. I have been unable to find any information on her early life, maiden name or when she was married. However, her name was not Natasha, as she clearly was known by, but Natalia. As we shall see later, I do have more information on her husband.

From a 1936 Shopping Guide to Peking
By the late 1940s, she was resident in Hong Kong, probably one of first of many thousands of White Russians to move from China through Hong Kong as the communists took control and before exit visas were required. However, she was also in Hong Kong in 1937, possibly temporarily, as the Japanese invasion of China and the continuing civil war made life in Peking difficult. She announced in the SCMP:  Travel to Peking now being difficult Madame Du Breuil has brought down the entire stock of Old Cathay from 22 Legation Street, Opening shortly. 6 December 1937. In 1936, her shop was listed in The Peiping (Peking) Shopping Guide (Peiying Press, Yientsin).

I have found no evidence that she was or was not in Hong Kong during the Japanese occupation of 1941-45.

On 9 January 1947 the SCMP contained the statutory notice that she, Natalia du Breuil, had applied to the Governor of Hong Kong for naturalization as a British Subject. Her address was 6 Basilea, Lyttelton Road, that used by Burkhardt in 1952. Basilea, a terrace of six two-storied houses, with Number 1 shown here on Gwulo, was demolished by developers in 1954.

On 17 April 1947 the SCMP reported that she had donated HK$100 to the British Flood Relief Fund launched to provide relief after the floods that devastated Britain after months of hard frost. The cynic in me cannot resist thinking that could have done her application for naturalization no harm.

Natasha du Breuil was clearly a learned, highly intelligent and socially active newcomer to the Hong Kong scene and, one suspects, someone who was seen as a little exotic, but very much as socially superior, with her French name, to most other White Russians who in pre-war China were at the very bottom of the European social scale. Burkhardt family tradition has it that she daughter of the last Tsar's Master of Horse.

Madame du Breuil in 1953.
I have blacked out the wife of
the Chief Justice
The only photograph I have found in SCMP was taken on 11 November 1953 at an event at the YWCA when she would have been 62.

Her activities reflecting her wide interests in the culture and history of China to natural history, in Hong Kong included the YWCA, Biological Circle (Committee, 1952) and later the Royal Asiatic Society (RAS) as a member of council of the Hong Kong branch after it had been resurrected in 1959. For example in May 1950 she gave a talk at the YWCA on Chinese silk; in 1953 she gave talks for children at the same venue on ‘Fish, newts and tortoises’ and on ‘Preparing an aquarium’. In the same series, Burkhardt spoke on butterflies and J.D. Romer on snakes.

Her, and Colonel Burkhardt’s, address by 1956 was 86 Main Street, Stanley (now a restaurant).


Natasha du Breuil and Valentine Burkhardt at the Luk Kwok Hotel, Wanchai, Hong Hong.
For a companion photograph (with the name of the restaurant on a table cloth) see the article on
Burkhardt. Photograph probably circa 1965

In his report for 1966, the President of the Hong Kong branch of the RAS, J.R. Jones* wrote: ‘Towards the end of the year we lost one of our most faithful members, Madam du Breuil, who was always an inspiration and a most zealous supporter of the Society. We feel her loss very deeply.’ The next year he added that the Society’s collection of books had been enhanced by the addition of ‘about 100 books from the library of the late Colonel Burkhardt and Madame du Breuil generously presented by Colonel Burkhardt's daughter’.

Echoes of Natasha du Briel collection of antiques appear in the sale rooms. Thus, in November 2012 at Christie’s in London four jade figures from her collection were sold at auction, a Ming Dynasty hat finial for £2,750, a lion for £23,750, a duck for £5,250 and a mythical beast with cubs for £30,000. The provenance stated: ‘From an old English private collection, acquired in Hong Kong in the 1950s and thence by descent. By repute, from the Mme. du Breuil Collection, Hong Kong’. As a collector and former dealer, she clearly knew what she was about.

Some of the jade items from Natasha du Breuil's
collection sold at Christie's in 2012
There was also a jade box sold at Christie's in 2013 for £10,000. The lot was accompanied by an old letter to Lady Winifred Cecil (1903-1992) stating that the box had been sent to her by N. Du Breuil, Old Cathay, Legation Street, Peking. Since Lady Winifred Cecil was married in December 1937, the letter must have been sent at some time earlier.

But what of Madame du Breuil’s husband? Well, that’s where the black deeds come in. He was the grandson of Diego Y Eshappar or Dubreuil-Eshappar or Dubreuille-Echappare or Dubreuil-Echappare (1816-1867). The grandfather was born in Spain of French descent. He came to be a famous Russian naval engineering officer. His father was Governor of Manila in the Phillipines and after his wife died his new wife, a member of a local tribe, ignored his children. Therefore, he asked  the Russian explorer Fyodor Litke to take on his sons as ship’s boys and take them to St Petersburg for a good education. Diego joined the navy and became the pioneer of steam power in the Russian fleet. His son produced Vladimir N. Dubreuil-Echappare who graduated from the top military academy Corps des Pages (cadets had to do a turn as a page to members of the imperial family) in 1909. By the time of the Russian Revolution he was a Colonel of the Life Guards’ 3rd Rifle Regiment. Life Guards officers enjoyed a one or two rank upgrade over the rest of the Russian forces and so he was probably the equivalent of Major. As a White Russian on the eastern front, he withdrew from Omsk to the east with the American mission. In China, first in Harbin and then Tienstsin (Tianjin) he worked for "Our Way”, the newspaper of the Russian Fascist Party, as a translator. That party was founded in 1931 but there was a forerunner founded in Harbin in 1925.

It was from Tientsin that the extraordinary story of Dubreuil-Echappare reached the SCMP.  On 7 June 1927 the newspaper reported:

Boys Kidnapped
Sensational Affair in Tientsin
Russians Arrested
     Tientsin was startles recently by the news of an extraordinary kidnapping story.
     It appears that on Friday, on a charge of attempting the abduction of Anastasius and Alexander, two of the four sons of Mr N. Kulayeff, a wealthy Russian financier, of Villa Margherita, Woodrow Wilson Street, Tientsin, the police of the First Special Administrative Area [the old German concession, administered after the First World War by the Chinese government] arrested two Russians, named Unuzhnikoff and Sokolovski, in the cellar of some empty premises at No 74, Taku Road
    It is alleged that these two men were concerned in demanding from the father of the two young men a sum of $150,000 in ransom money and that the two young men themselves were found in the cellar with them when the police arrived.
Arrest of Mr Echapparre
     About 9 p.m. on Friday evening, the British Municipal Police, acting upon information received from the Chinese authorities, arrested Mr W [sic] Du Breuil d’Echapparre, a well-known former officer in the Russian army, while on his way home from his office, on a charge of being a fellow conspirator in the alleged offence.
     On Saturday morning, Mr D’Ehapparre was handed over by British Police to the police of the No 1 Special Area. A fourth man, an unidentified Russian, is now being searched for by the Chinese police. This man drove the automobile in which the lads were taken to the house in Taku Road.
     According to the police evidence, the two Kulayeff brothers went on the Thursday evening to a cinema and afterwards proceeded to Kiessling’s Cafe in Woodrow Wilson Street. At about one o’clock they started to accompany two girls to their homes in the Ex-Russian Concession.
Taken in Car
     On the Bund, it is alleged, they met Mr Du Breuil d’Echapparre, who asked if he might walk with the party. The five persons then crossed the Russian Ferry and the girls were seen home.
     The two Kulayeff brothers and Mr d’Echapparre then returned to the ferry and on reaching the city side, the latter said he would like to take them home in his car, which was waiting near-by, at the corner of Council Road.
     The young men, who had previously been slightly acquainted with Mr d’Echapparre, consented. Unuzhnikoff and Sokolovski were, it is alleged, inside the car, while another Russian was acting as chauffeur.
At the Point of the Pistol
     The car was driven first to the French Concession and then in a roundabout way to the ex-German Concession in the neighbourhood where the lads’ father lives. Here, it is alleged, d’Echapparre produced a pistol and told the lads they would be held to ransom. Masks were placed over their faces, the blinds of the car were drawn down and at the point of the pistol, their captors took the two lads to the cellar of the premises at No 74 Taku Road.
     Two men kept watch while the others took a demand to the father for ransom money. The police state that Mt Kulayeff was presented with a letter demanding the sum of $150,000. Mr Kulayeff rejected the demand but, apparently fearing for the well-being of his sons, he did not inform the police of what had occurred, and tried to deal with the matter himself.
     The detectives of the First Special Area, however, had already learned of the disappearance of the young men and they set to work smartly to ferret them out. It was a quick piece of work. which reflects great credit on the police, for within a few hours, the young men and the Russians, Unuzhnikoff and Sokolovski were discovered in the cellar in Taku Road.

The kidnapping is also reported in the Russian Wikipedia page on the family but as told by the business man I.B. Kulaev (i.e. Kulayeff) in an autobiographical memoir Under a Lucky Star published in Russian in 2006. Kulaev went on to found the Antonia & Vladimer Kulaev Cultural Heritage Fund in California†.

The story was followed up by the SCMP on 4 August 1927:

     It is understood that the two Russians, Du Breuil d’Echappare and Ugujnikoff, who were committed for trial in connection with the Kulayeff kidnapping affair in Tientsin recently have been sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.

The most amateur sleuth will find this incompetent kidnapping puzzling. Did du Breuil d’Echapparre, who was known by those kidnapped, intend to take the money and disappear abroad? What happened to the other kidnapper, Sokolovski? Did he do the Chinese law equivalent of turning King’s evidence? And how did the police get to know of the kidnapping?  In the introductory biographical note on the auction catalogue for the sale of Valentine Burkhardt's stamp collection contains the sentence: ‘When they first met Madam[e] de [sic] Breuil was helping Russians escape the Bolsheviks’. On re-reading my earlier post on Natasha, I am still intrigued by her late husband’s failed attempt at kidnap. Was this some part of White Russian political cloak and daggery or just an attempt to get money for a life in South America?

From a book on the lives of Russian guards officers, the Wikipedia article states that du Breuil d’Echappere went to Argentina and was killed in Buenos Aires on 14 October 1935.

Nowhere have I been able to find any reference to Natasha but from the information on all the du Breuil d’Echappere family, there seems no doubt that this was her husband. There may be information in Russian publications including the book on guards officers referred to above. I know that a number of Russians read this blog. Could they help in providing further information including finding out the pre-du Breuil history of Natasha (Natalia) and how she became interested in natural history.

She had no other family since Colonel Burkhardt’s daughter gave the RAS library her books.

A question that springs to mind is, was she in Tientsin in 1927 at the time of the kidnapping? The question is pertinent because the then Major Burkhardt was Brigade Major (i.e. chief of staff) for the Tientsin Area of China Command (I read that the British Army kept two battalions at Tientsin). Did they first meet then or when both were in Peking in the 1930s?

---------------------

**Her letters as part of a correspondence group, Aquarists' Internationale, were reported in Water Life magazine. In previous posts are recorded her interests in fish and reptiles. Further extracts on her keeping marine fish and geckos were reported in Water Life June-July 1953 (volume 8, No 3), February-March (volume 10, No 1) and June-July 1955 (10, No 3), June-July 1956 (11 No 3). She also wrote about breeding White Cloud Mountain Minnows (April 1952). The earliest record I have is from the August issue of 1948. It was reported she had written to a friend asking for her subscription to the magazine to be paid (she had seen an advertisement for it in an American magazine). She said she was looking forward to the revival of the Hong Kong Aquarium Society and wrote: 'I hope that by now you know that I am among your constant readers and that Water Life is coming to Hong Kong regularly'. He correspondent in U.K. was R.W. Andrews, an aquarist whose name appears regularly in Water Life and was a fellow member of Gene Wolfsheimer's Aquarists' Internationale but of whom I know nothing else other that in 1948 he was living at 42 Endymion Road, Harringay, London.

*J. R. Jones CBE MC (1887-1976) was legal adviser to the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC). He seemed always to have been known by his initials and was the leading light of the Welsh expatriates in Hong Kong. He appeared to have been responsible for the art collection of the Bank. People found him friendly but mysterious; as did I on the one occasion I was introduced to him.  Only on a website describing his gift of a Chinese chair as a prize for the National Eisteddfod in 1933 have I found his names (John Robert Jones) and the fact that he went to Shanghai in 1924 where he was a barrister.

†The translated blurb from the book: The amazing life and the fate of Ivan Kulaeva can serve as a model for the true entrepreneur. Sixteen year old boy, the son of exiled to a Siberian penal servitude of the peasant, after his father's death, managed to become the owner of a number of commercial enterprises. Fate did not indulge self-taught entrepreneur. Defiant, he tries luck on the goldfields in the tundra, drowned beneath the ice of the Yenisei, survived the Chinese Boxer Rebellion, Russian-Japanese and First World War, revolution, nationalization of property, kidnapping bandit. Every time starting from zero, he believed in his good fortune, in his lucky star. The book recreates the real life environment, the economy and industry of Siberia. In 1930 in San Francisco, he created Kulaev Awareness and Charity Foundation, whose extensive work continues to this day.

Last updated 5 February 2018

Wednesday, 24 February 2016

The Big-headed Terrapin, Platysternon megacephalum, can climb


A note I found in Water Life of August 1957, brought back memories of ten years later in Hong Kong:

     Mme Natasha du Breuil of Hong Kong, wrote recently to Aquarists’ Internationale colleague Henry Nicholls to tell him she had acquired a ferocious tree-climbing turtle, Platysternum [sic] megacephalum. Mr Nichols writes, “In town shopping she saw a Chinese man hurrying by in the opposite direction with a basketful of turtles. She took a few seconds to realise they looked cold, then reversed direction to catch him up. They were indeed tree-climbing turtles, so she bought one for the equivalent of 2/6d, and popped it into her market basket and sped for home before the beast could devour her leg of lamb, pound of cheese and pound and a half of bird seed. He is now enjoying a recuperative nap!”
     Later news from Mme Du Breuil herself is that the turtle has settled down well to vivarium life. She says, “In spite of the bad reputation they have mine has not shown any desire to bite me when handles, but it can open its jaws more like a snake than a turtle. It attacks food in a most realistic hunting style. I have never seen it come out on the rock provided in its tank but, when I put it in the yard, it showed most astonishing speed, making a sudden dash for cover, very much as a lizard would do.”

That snippet was accompanied by a photograph by A. de la Moussaye.

Our experience in the late 1960s of this species, Platysternon megacephalum, the Big-headed Terrapin, now classified as Endangered by IUCN, provided a more powerful demonstration of its climbing abilities. In amongst the other terrapins, we rescued one from Central Market before it made somebody’s dinner. Before taking it into the lab the next day to put it into an aquarium before release, we put it on the balcony of our flat on Conduit Road in a bowl of water. The balcony was surrounded by a wall of smooth, painted concrete about four feet high. The next morning there was no sign of the terrapin. Had a kite taken it in the early hours? We looked up and down Conduit Road but then turned to see the two caretakers staring at something in the garages under the block of flats. There in a puddle of water was the terrapin. She (see later) must somehow have climbed the wall possibly in one corner.

The rule shows inches
She fed voraciously on pieces of meat and fish and a few days later produced a single egg. Our departure from Hong Kong was brought forward and we did not have the time to find a mountain stream in which to release her. Instead, she went into one of the goldfish ponds then in the university compound. There was a nearby nullah and our guess was that if she survived at all, she could have made her way up the nullah to the more gentle streams that flow from the Peak. As Madame du Breuil noted these terrapins can really move at speed on land.


On the roof of the now demolished Northcote Science
Building at the University of Hong Kong, the Big-head
needed to be tethered

The head, which cannot be fully withdrawn, appears
to have an armoured exoskeleton

Incidentally, I have found a single reference to Aquarists Internationale. It was apparently a society founded by Gene Wolfsheimer, a well-known and innovative aquarist of the time. He loomed large in my recent posts  on ‘lactation’ in discus fish.

But who was Madame Du Breuil? In finding out I discovered a great deal about two amateur naturalists active in Hong Kong in the 1950s and 1960s. They will the subject of a future post.


Sunday, 21 February 2016

‘Lactation’ in Discus Fish: Water Life magazine follows up

In the final months before Water Life (renamed Fishkeeping and Water Life for its final year) was closed down, it followed up on its articles on breeding discus fish.

In July 1958, Professor Clifford Emmens wrote an article, Hormones and reproduction in fishes, which contained a photograph by Roy Skipper of an adult discus with young. In that article, he suggested that the production of mucus for feeding the young was most likely under the control of the pituitary hormone, prolactin, rather than the sex hormones, oestrogen and androgen. This prediction was upheld by work in Japan and Germany that was published in 1962 and 1965.


Clifford Walter Emmens (1913-99) was then Professor of Veterinary Physiology in the University of Sydney but also a well-known aquarist. A man of ‘incandescent temper’, he was well known in London because he had worked at the National Institute of Medical Research on reproductive physiology. He had a distinguished record in the Second World War, working in Zuckerman’s team that became the Bombing Survey Unit; he became an accomplished statistician, writing a book on bioassay.

In the final issue of December 1958, Roy and Gwen Skipper had another article, Breeding Pompadour fish, What the microscope reveals. This shows the sections of scales taken from parental and non-parental fish by Hildemann. I think they are the figures from Hildemann’s paper but which are missing from the rather badly scanned online version of the latter. I have scanned them from the article and arranged them so that they clearly demonstrate the thickened outer epidermis and the enlarged mucus-producing cells in those fish with young:


   
   


Photomicrographs of sections of scales taken by W.H. Hildemann from
the Skippers' non-parental and parental discus fish. Note the enlarged
mucus-producing cells and the hypertrophied epidermis

Meanwhile, in the August 1958 issue, it was reported that Roy Skipper had given up fishkeeping because of increased  business commitments and that his entire stock of fish (including breeding pairs of discus), plants, equipment, books and photographs had been advertised for sale in the previous issue (July 1958). Also shown was a photograph (reproduced) of Roy Skipper collecting daphnia from a pond. That looked like the end but the Skippers later  returned to fishkeeping with a retail shop, The House of Fishes in Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire.


----------------

Emmens CW. 1958. Hormones and reproduction in fishes. Fishkeeping and Water Life 13 (9 new issue, July 1958) 441-443.

Skipper R, Skipper G. 1958 Breeding Pompadour fish. What the microscope reveals. Fishkeeping and Water Life 13 (14 new issue, December 1958) 700.

Friday, 19 February 2016

Who discovered ‘lactation’ in Discus fish?

While I was scanning issues of the old Water Life magazine for articles on herpetology for my other blog, I came across an article from April 1957 that drew my attention. It was on the successful breeding of the Discus fish by Roy and Gwen Skipper and contained a description of the fry feeding on the side of the body of the adults.

A slide of a discus (Symphysodon) appeared in many of the lectures that I gave on lactation. It was there to remind the audience that while the possession of mammary glands is the defining characteristic of mammals, other vertebrates also feed their offspring from a secretion of one or both parents. The other classic example is the crop ‘milk’ of pigeons. It was known that lactation in mammals and the production of pigeon crop milk are induced by the hormone prolactin. Therefore, there was a frisson of excitement in the mid-1960s when it was discovered that prolactin also induced the formation of mucus on which the young discus fish feed.

It is very difficult to determine who first saw young discus fish feeding off their parents and who first recorded the phenomenon. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, These fish were highly sought after by amateur aquarists and therefore expensive. Both amateur and professional aquarists were trying to breed them in captivity, the latter to cash in on the high prices. Some professional and some amateur aquarists did not reveal the methods they used, the former for commercial reasons and the latter for the admiration of their wet-fingered trade secrets by fellow amateurs, an inability or unwillingness to write of their findings or simply for admiring their own handiwork in complete privacy. Secondly, the efforts to breed discus were going on all over the world in the countries into which adults had been imported. Language barriers and the local circulation of magazines and club newsletters meant that aquarists in the USA might be completely unaware of progress in Germany, for example. Just to add a further complication, the Second World War and its aftermath prevented free communication and, unlike in the scientific world where abstracting journals helped bring published knowledge from all parts of the world, there was no such gathering of information from aquarium magazines and societies.

It is not then surprising that efforts to describe the history of discus fish breeding have led to acrimonious online discussions, such as the one shown here, about who did what, when and in which country. Only now, as such exchanges occur between countries do letters, memories of old conversations and obscure publications, emerge. To cut a long story short, it would seem that the Germans, as so often with the keeping and breeding of wild animals in captivity, got there first in describing how young feed from the the parents, in the form of a Hermann Härtel from Dresden in 1936. (According to an article in Water Life published in 1955, the first live discus fish were imported to Hamburg in 1923.) A correspondent to the forum referred to above, provided a translation of what Härtel had written (although the source of the publication is not given): “…now it became clear to me that the larvae are dependent on the parents completely. It is probable that the adults secret[e] food from the skin sucked by the young.”


Water Life in its final issue
congratulated Gene Wolfsheimer
on his marriage and printed a
photograph

But none of this was known when aquarists in the USA and UK were attempting to breed these fish, then known by the common name of Pompadours, as imports from South America began after the Second World War. What caught my eye in the Water Life article was the first description I had seen of the discovery of  how these fish feed their young in Britain and of how some scientific muscle had been pulled in to help describe what was going on. But earlier in 1957, Water Life had published an article by Gene Wolfsheimer of California under the title, Pompadour Fish Spawning—the American Way. In 1956 he had obtained eight tank-bred young discus. Note ‘tank-bred’ because these fish were being raised in small numbers by aquarists who were trying to find an acceptable food for the fry from hatching. Eggs were separated from the parents and rearing on all sorts of potential food items was attempted. Most aquarists failed to rear the young but a few succeeded. Wolfsheimer raised the fish to adulthood and they bred. He wrote:

     Three days after hatching, the little fry began to drop from their final pre-swimming site and in a matter of minutes they started swimming. Immediately they seemed able to discern the huge forms of their ever-watchful parents and swam up to one or the other to cling to their sides. Feeding from the sides of the parents also began at this time and was carried through until the young fish were placed by themselves in another aquarium.
     Much has now been written about this wonderful natural phenomenon of the fry obtaining their first food from the bodies of the parents that little more need be added. It has been noted by myself and two other local fishkeepers who have also spawned Pompadours (only one was successful in raising a few young). Mr Richard Haas, President of the Los Angeles Aquarium Society, and Mr Charles Wall, of Whittier, California, that prior to and during the spawning and caring for the young fish, the parents seem to manufacture a heavier amount of body slime than normal. At times, when carefully studied, they seem to be covered, almost frostlike in appearance, with an over-abundance of this secretion. We can only theorize that during the excitement and activity of the spawning, certain estrogen hormones are made active and induced to over-produce excessive body slime, providing ample nourishment for the fry.


From the 1957 article by Roy and Gwen Skipper
At the same time, In 1956, Roy (1921-2001) and Gwen (1923-2012) Skipper in Britain had observed the fry feeding from the sides of their parents. However, they interpreted this behaviour as the young feeding on micro-organisms which were living commensally on the skin. They, therefore, tried to raise the fry on Vorticella, collected from a local pond, having previously tried a number of potential food items. The Vorticella were ignored and the fry died. However, the adults then bred again and the young again fed from the sides of the parents. They describe what happened next:

     A few days later were were talking to Dr H.G. Vevers, M.B.E., Curator of the Aquarium at London Zoo, about this phenomenon and invited him along to witness the unusual behaviour. About the same time we had the good fortune to meet Dr W.H. Hildemann, an American scientist working at University College, London.  Dr Hildemann was fully conversant with the anaesthetizing of fishes and suggested that he be allowed to anaesthetize one of the adults that were bringing up the brood and examine the skin of this fish under a microscope. This would be a certain way of finding the nature of the food that the fry were feeding on.

Their article goes on to report what Hildemann found. However, he wrote up the observations in a paper published in American Naturalist in 1959, together with what he knew of the earlier attempts to breed discus, and so I will quote from his paper rather from that of the Skippers. This is what he wrote on the mucus:

     The skin and scales of non-breeding adults revealed nothing extraordinary…Adult breeders in process of rearing young, however, presented an entirely different appearance. Even to the unaided eye, it was apparent that both parents possessed an abundant whitish material over the entire surface of the body. Under the microscope no algae, protozoans, rotifers, or crustaceans were observed on the parents, but a copious mucous secretion with a granular composition covered the entire body including the fins. The secretion was more concentrated dorsally and, when rubbed gently with the finger, it became filamentous. Clumps and filaments of this mucus were readily dislodged into the surrounding water by rubbing the skin. The mucus had considerable cohesiveness and even the larger young had to tug and jerk to remove it from the parents.
     When placed on a glass slide and examined at 430x the mucus was observed to be acellular and amorphous and, therefore, undoubtedly a secretion. Several scales with attached skin were carefully removed with a fine curved forceps from the female parent and a non-parental adult and fixed in Heidenhain’s SUSA fluid. It should be mentioned that all of these large specimens survived the experimental manipulations without ill effect. The scales were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 10mu. The difference between the skins of the parental and non-parental fish is at once evident.
     Numerous, large mucous cells are seen in the epidermis of the parental adult, whereas smaller mucous cells are just visible in the non-parental fish. Moreover, the parental skin is much hypertrophied in comparison with the non-parental skin.
     
Hildemann also dealt with the early attempts in the USA to breed discus. He stated that the first clue to ‘normal nurture’ came in 1949 when W.T. Dodd reported to the Oregon Aquarium Society, “the babies hung against the sides of the parents, receiving free rides—using the breeders as landing fields”. He continued:

     But since discus are usually difficult to breed and very expensive (even now a pair of adult breeders is worth about $350*), other aquarists were unwilling to risk leaving the young with the parents. Yet even in the presence of an abundance of various aquatic microorganisms few or no fry survived for more than a week in the absence of parents.

He then noted that some young had been reared in the absence of parents but that other experienced aquarists, including Roy Skipper, had been unable to induce the fry to eat any kind of live food. He then described what he describes as the normal parent-offspring relationship:

     Both parents take turns guarding, fanning, and mouthing the eggs. The parents pick up the newly-hatched fish with their mouths and transfer them to together to various surfaces where each remains attached, wriggling violently at the end of a short thread. The fry become freeswimming four days after hatching and promptly move to the parents’ sides where they begin to feed from their skin. Although both parents are capable of feeding the young, both take rest periods and, by a flick of the body, are proficient at transferring all the fry to the other parent. Alternatively, when there appears to be a scarcity of food on one of the parents, the fry will move to the other. After a week or more feeding off the parents the fry will ingest other food such as newly-hatched Artemia or sifted nauplii of Cyclops. The young continue to feed on the parental skin for at least five weeks, even though an abundance of live food is available…


Hildemann included a photograph (shown on the right) by Wolfsheimer showing fry on the sides of a parent.

So who was W.H. Hildemann? William H. Hildemann (1927-1983) was a well-known immunologist†. When he met the Skippers he was a Research Fellow of the U.S. National Cancer Institute working on transplantation with Medawar in the Department of Zoology at University College, London. He was the right man in the right place at the right time because one of his main research topics was in transplantation immunology in fish which involved transplanting scales from one fish to another. He later returned to the USA as we shall see next.

Reference in online fora is made to an article in National Geographic in 1960. I have found and read this article and I can see why readers of it have become confused. It was written by Wolfsheimer, illustrated with his own photographs, and begins with what is essentially a reprise of his article in Water Life. But then he describes Hildemann’s findings without stating that they were made on the Skippers’ fish in UK! Having described his own experiences throughout the article Wolfsheimer leaves the impression that Hildemann had studied the scales of his (i.e. Wolfsheimer's) fish in California. 

The first pages of Wolfsheimer's article in
National Geographic
These two paragraphs show the two paragraphs (separated by a sub-heading, Fish secrete mysterious “milk”) that give the wrong impression:


     Since they grew fatter and more vigorous each day, I could only conclude that they were somehow being nourished by the parents. Close inspection just before breeding had revealed that the slimy protective coating on he scales of the adults had thickened considerably. I felt that the babies were feeding upon this substance. But what was it?
     Dr William H. Hildemann, currently of the University of California at Los Angelel’s School of Medicine, investigated the problem. Anaesthetizing both breeding and nonbreeding adult discus…

I am left with a nasty taste in the mouth, as I can imagine, were Roy and Gwen Skipper at the time.

I also have the strong impression that aquarists in Hong Kong were also aware of the breeding habits of discus. After the Blum & Fiedler paper on the effects of exogenous prolactin in discus, a few pairs were installed in the aquarium tanks at the back of the teaching lab in Zoology at the University of Hong Kong. I was demonstrating one day in 1966 or 1967 and a student told me that there was not a cat in hell’s chance of their breeding in those conditions. He said that his father had bred discus for many years and described the method which I carefully wrote down (in writing this post I thought I knew where the piece of paper was but I now cannot find it). Confirmation of breeding by dealers in Hong Kong is confirmed by a snippet in the same issue (page 90) of Water Life from 1957 as the Skippers’ final article appears:

     Mme. N. du Breuil (Hong Kong) writes:-….Yesterday I had to go to Kowloon, across the harbour, and I always stop at George Bing’s place. He told me, and showed a photograph, of tanks swarming with baby Pompadour fish. He managed to bring up a swarming of over 100 to inch-diameter size, and them sold them to Australia or New Zealand. In the next spawning the eggs were all fungused.

New information on who did what and when is emerging all the time, including while I was researching this post. Thus, in response to the posting on the Facebook Discus Study Group of the Skippers’ earlier article in Water Life of November 1956, in which the feeding off the skin was described, on 9 January 2016 Tommy Saville posted a comment:

     This was the first publication of the fact that discus fry fed off their parents. Prior to that, they were treated like Angel [fish] fry. I made the discovery 2 years before but kept it a secret (I was in the aquatic trade!).

This comment triggered a nostalgia trip because my first fish tank and goldfish were bought from Tom C. Saville’s shop which was in Beeston, near Nottingham. 

Shortly after the publications I have mentioned, the breeding of discus became routine; artificial diets that fry would accept were devised (the fish equivalent of formula feeding rather than breast feeding) and the discus fancy craze began with the artificial selection for various colour varieties—the sort of animal breeding activity I utterly loathe. Breeding fancy discus is now big business. Indeed I was shocked to find that the websites of two discus dealers in U.K. listed no wild-type discus at all. Discus fish have been reduced to ornaments.

I should end this post by pointing out that the taxonomy of these fish is confused, and having read something of the information available I am not convinced by any of the arguments on whether there are one, two or three species in the genus Symphysodon.

Finally, something that was not possible in 1967, a YouTube video of discus fry feeding on their parents (albeit of a colour variety).




——————————————-

*about $3000 or £2000 today.

†Obituary in Journal of Immunology, 1964 volume 132.

Hildemann WH. 1959. A cichlid fish, Symphysodon, with unique nurture habits. American Naturalist 93, 27-34.

Skipper R, Skipper G. 1956. Pompadours successfully bred in Britain. Water Life and Aquaria World 11 (3 new issue, June-July 1956) 126-129.

Skipper R, Skipper G. 1957. Those British-bred Pompadours—the story completed. Water Life and Aquaria World 12 (2 new issue, April-May 1957) 63-64.

Wolfsheimer G. 1957. Pompadour fish spawning—the American way. Water Life and Aquarium World  12 (1 new issue, February-March 1957) 14-16.

Wolfsheimer G. 1960, The Discus fish yields a secret. National Geographic 117 (5, May 1960) 674-681.