Wednesday, 28 August 2024

Salt Glands Revisited. Hubert and Mable Frings in 1958: The Salt Glands of the Albatross

Fifty years ago the late Jim Linzell and I were writing our monograph, Salt Glands in Birds and Reptiles, for the Physiological Society; it was published in May 1975. In this series I revisit some of the topics and people who followed up the discovery of salt glands in birds by Knut Schmidt-Nielsen.

——————————-

Knowledge of how birds survive at sea can be divided into two eras: Pre-1957 and Post-1957. It was in 1957 that Knut Schmidt-Nielsen (1915-2007), along with his colleagues, Carl Christian Barker Jörgensen and Humio Osaki, who were visiting scientists at Duke University in North Carolina, discovered salt glands. These organs secrete salt at very high concentrations allowing marine birds to get rid of excess salt which they may ingest by drinking seawater and/or by eating invertebrates like squid which contain much more salt than fish.

The kidneys of birds and reptiles, in contrast to those of mammals, simply cannot produce urine with a high salt concentration. Therefore the discovery of an extrarenal route of salt excretion from glands in the head and emptying into the nostrils explained why marine birds could drink water and survive on salt-rich prey containing. Until then there had been no agreement, some observers claiming that not only could such birds drink seawater but also that, in captivity, seawater was essential for their survival.

Few zoos attempted to keep pelagic birds—those that remain far out at sea for months or years. But those that did came to the conclusion that they must be provided with saltwater or with salt added to their food, usually fish. In 1925 Glover Morrill Allen (1879-1942) then recently appointed to lecture in zoology at Harvard, wrote in his book, Birds and Their Attributes of 1925:

Most sea-birds are known to drink salt water in preference to fresh; indeed captive gulls may die without it.

That is why, my previous post on the keeping and failing to keep Waved Albatrosses at Brookfield Zoo, Chicago, in 1935, is interesting. They were fed by hand on freshwater fish dipped into salty water.

However, the work of Schmidt-Nielsen and his colleagues threw no light on why pelagic birds would need salt water in order to live. In all species of birds, including domestic ducks and geese, tested thus far, the salt glands only turn on in response to the ingestion of salt water sufficient to raise the osmolarity of the blood. No salt water: no secretion. Thus pelagic birds should be fine living on fresh water. It was only several months after the full paper by Schmidt-Nielsen and his colleagues was published that this apparent anomaly came to light.

Schmidt-Nielsen’s discovery had actually started in the late 1930s but the war and his move to the USA had delayed his following up his earlier, inconclusive, experiments in Norway. The discovery was followed up by reports from those who had realised they had seen salt gland secretion in actioon, drops of fluid appearing on the end of beaks for example, without appreciating the significance. Others with access to marine birds, followed suit to demonstrate the presence of salt glands in other species. 

In January 1958, Hubert and Mable Frings of the Department of Zoology and Entomology at Penn State University were on Midway, that famous island in the Pacific. They worked on sound communication in insects (Hubert had started off as, primarily, an entomologist, and were trying to see if sound could be used in pest control, invertebrate and vertebrate. It would appear they were on Midway because of a contract they had or were about to get with the US Office of Naval Research. The US Navy was very concerned because aircraft and albatrosses have a habit of colliding. In a report of research done between 1959 and 1963, the scale of the problem can be seen:

At Midway Naval Station, 1,100 miles west-northwest of Honolulu, military aircraft collide with flying albatrosses at the rate of about 300 to 400 per year. One aircraft out of every five that hits an albatross on takeoff either aborts (stops before it is airborne), or dumps fuel and returns for appraisal of damage. About 70,000 pairs of Laysan albatrosses [Phoebastria immutabilis] and 7,000 pairs of blackfooted albatrosses [Phoebastria nigripes] nest at Midway in any given year. The population is declining.

The Frings knew of the then very recent discovery of salt glands and took the opportunity to look for any signs of salt glands in action:

The birds were, therefore, observed with this in mind, and it was noted that after fighting among the Black-foots, or occasionally during the ritual dancing, some of the birds showed drops of fluid at the tips of the beaks. Furthermore, during a local harassment campaign, many of the birds in the treated area were actively dripping. This suggested that the gland could be activated by “stress” or excitement.

There was a limit to what could be achieved on Midway and so the US Navy agreed to fly four birds of each of the two species to Pennsylvania. They arrived on 18 April and were housed initially in an old hen house on the university farm. The vicissitudes of getting the birds to swallow the offered food and unsatisfactory housing and water supplies were explained in a full paper in Condor, and here I will only describe some salient points. The Black-footed Albatrosses soon learnt to take food offered by hand. The Laysan did not and until it was found that a piece of fish, for example, could be slid into the beak nearer the mouth and would be swallowed, they declined. Two of the latter died but not of inanition but, it would seem, a lack of salt. Handling and disturbance was seen to result in secretion by the salt glands but the birds drank the fresh water provided. When the two remaining Laysans were declining badly, it was decided to give each an injection of salt. Recovery was remarkably rapid. Within ten minutes the birds were up and walking normally. The Fringses concluded that because salt-gland secretion can be induced by excitement or “stress” in these birds and because they had no opportunity to drink salt water, they became hyponatraemic. They seemed unable to distinguish fresh water from salt water.

These problems were overcome by providing salt in gelatine capsules embedded in the fish used to feed the birds. Later, an artificial  sea water pool was provided and the birds were seen drinking from it.

The remaining birds thrived and were moved by air, first in June  to the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, Salisbury Cove, Maine, where they were given real sea water in tubs from which they drank. Then, on  20 August 1958, they were sent to the  National Zoological Park in Washington, D.C. ‘where Drs. Theodore Reed and Malcolm Davis are continuing with the methods described here’. I do not know what became of the birds after they reached Washington.

Thus Hubert & Mable Frings explained why some marine birds need salt water to drink when in captivity. In the wild any loss of salt evinced by the salt glands switching on seemingly inappropriately would easily be made up from squid in the diet or by drinking sea water.

I will return in a later article to the question of salt-gland secretion appearing or the rate being changed by internal or external stimuli caused other than by an increase in the tonicity of the blood plasma. I will do so with some trepidation since the story ends with a most horrific human tragedy.

The main reason for the birds being caught and flown to Pennsylvania was of course to investigate the salt-gland secretion. This was done while the albatrosses were still at Penn State. For this phase, Hubert Frings enlisted the collaboration of Adam Anthony from the physiology section of the Biology Department (1923-2012) and Martin Warren Schein (1925-1998) who had wide interests in animal behaviour and then in the Poultry Science Department. Their paper was published in Science. When stimulated by supplying salt capsules in the food, the secretion contained between 792 and 856 m-moles of sodium per litre. This concentration of sodium is twice that of sea water.

The concentration of salt-gland secretion compared with sea water is of course the key to understanding the role of the salt gland in marine birds. While it is convenient shorthand to describe the function of the glands as getting rid of excess salt, it would be of no use to the bird if the concentration did not exceed that of sea water. The whole mechanism is there because it enables birds to obtain osmotically-free water. As such it is a highly effective desalination plant that requires some of the highest rates of blood flow ever observed while its cells are stuffed with mitochondria to drive the energetically expensive transport systems across its cell membranes.

Although the rate of secretion was not measured the group assembled by Hubert Frings noted the secretion is discharged from the nasal glands through small openings below each tube-nostril. The fluid then flows along grooves on the beak to drip off the end. After being given a salt load, drops were seen falling at internals of 2-4 seconds.


A Northern Royal Albatross (Diomedea sanfordi) at the Royal Albatross Centre, Dunedin, New Zealand
I photographed this one through the glass of the hide in 2019. The small openings below the tube-nostrils
together with the grooves along the beak can be seen clearly.

But who were the Fringses who were in the right place and at the right time to embark on a study of the albatross salt gland?

Hubert William Frings was born in Philadelphia on 1 January 1914. His father, born in Germany, was a flooring contractor. Hubert graduated from what became Pennsylvania State University in 1936. He received a Master’s degree from the  University of Oklahoma in 1937, and a PhD from the University of Minnesota, in 1940. Teaching jobs, traceable to Iowa and Missouri, can be found in the records. He became an insect physiologist at the US Army’s Chemical Center in Maryland. He taught biology for a short time at Gustavus Adolphus College, Saint Peter, Minnesota in 1946-1947 but then returned to Penn State where he climbed the academic ladder until 1961. Then he went to the University of Hawaii until 1966. Hubert and Mable are commemorated there by an endowed scholarship. Finally, he joined the University of Oklahoma, becoming David Ross Boyd professor until his retirement in 1979.

Mable and Hubert Frings on their wedding
day, 9 June 1936
(from a family tree on ancestry.com)

Hubert married Mable Ruth Smith on 9 June 1936. Her family were farmers in Pennsylvania. She was born on 11 April 1912.

Hubert and Mable wrote two books: together: Animal Communication in 1964 and Concepts of Zoology in 1970.

As part of their support from the US Office of Naval Research, Hubert and Mable, together with their son Carl Frederick, published An Annotated Bibliography on North Pacific Albatrosses in 1966.

Mable died on 28 March 1998; Hubert on 8 September 2008, both in New Hampshire.

…Meanwhile on Midway the albatrosses are thriving with over 2 million birds nesting on 2.4 square miles of the atoll. The US Navy left in 1993 and flights to and from Henderson Field only occur at night during the nesting season.





Allen GM. 1925.  Birds and Their Attributes. Boston: Marshall Jones.

Frings H, Anthony A, Schein MW. 1958. Salt excretion by the nasal gland of Laysan and black-footed albatrosses. Science 128, 1572.

Frings H, Frings M. 1959. Observations on salt balance and behavior of Laysan and black-footed albatrosses in captivity. Condor 61, 305-14.

Peaker M, Linzell JL. 1975. Salt Glands in Birds and Reptiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Thursday, 22 August 2024

Waved (Galapagos) Albatross at Brookfield Zoo, Chicago, in 1935: a colour plate from 1969

In the days when colour printing was extremely expensive, the Avicultural Society had special appeals for funds to support the appearance in Avicultural Magazine of the occasional colour plate. A well-known bird artist was then commissioned. Although the whole run of the Society’s magazines can be found online, the plates rarely see the light of day. Therefore I decided to show one, now and again, on this site. This is the 19th in the series.

– – – – – – – – – –


The artist of this plate and author of the accompanying article was Karl Plath (1886-1970). Plath had trained and exhibited as an artist in Chicago before being asked to become Curator of Birds at what is now called Brookfield Zoo in 1935; he retired in 1961. He also had a large private collection of birds.

Plath describes how three Waved or Galapagos Albatrosses (Phoebastria irrorata) were kept at Brookfield Zoo ‘some years ago’. One died after seven months, another after ten. But one lived for 4 years and six months—not long in albatross terms but considered a success at the time. Unable to take off in the large flight cage (30 x 12 metres and 7 metres high) the bird, thought to be a male, walked around swinging its head from side to side.

Plath does not provide a date but I have found a press photograph for sale online which shows two of the birds and is dated 25 July 1935, i.e. shortly after Plath joined the zoo. Who collected the birds—and why?

This date of 1935 means there is more to this article than a simple description of events because the way in which the bird was fed at the time is of interest to those of us who have been involved in the physiology of marine birds and the history of a key discovery in this field in the 1950s. I will expand on this thread in a future article.

Avicultural Magazine 75, 1969


Thursday, 15 August 2024

The Besra in Hong Kong


This Besra (Accipiter virgatus) was photographed a few weeks ago in a tree it sometimes visits in the morning. The Besra is a forest bird but is known to frequent perches in the open at that time of day. It is widely distributed in southern Asia.

It is only in recent decades that the taxonomy and identification of sparrowhawks has been worked out. In the 1960s the Besra was completely unknown to Hong Kong birders. That is because there were only though to be two species visiting Hong Kong: the Japanese Sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis) and the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus). Both were thought to be passage migrants.  The Japanese Sparrowhawk and the Besra were thought to be geographical variants of the same species. When it was realised that two different species were involved, and it was found that one is actually resident in Hong Kong (Besra) and the other entirely migratory (Japanese) did the position become clear. The Eurasian is still a rare migrant.

Identification of the Besra as a Hong Kong bird, also cleared up our scratching of heads in earlier years, starting in 1966,  as we saw display flights of sparrowhawks above Hong Kong. We could not decide between the two stated to be there at the time. They seemed too big for Japanese and not in the season for migrants of either species. And would migrants be displaying?

The Besra must have become more common as there are more and more trees and bushes compared with the hillsides devastated for decades by the collection of firewood for cooking during the Japanese occupation. The latest field guide has them as ‘fairly common, widespread resident and possibly autumn migrant’ whereas in 2005 it was down as ‘a scarce resident, possibly with increased numbers in autumn’.


Monday, 12 August 2024

What’s this moth we saw in Portugal?



 

In a wood near Aljezur we saw this moth, best described as very hairy with very impressive antennae. Only after we got back home did we non-lepidopterists track down what it was. To confuse matters, it has recently had its name changed. We found a photograph online, also from Aljezur, of Ptilocephala albida. However, that species has been ‘split’ recently and the form in Portugal is now Ptilocephala lorquiniella.

The species is psychid moth, known collectively as bagworm moths since the larvae construct from silk and debris a case in which the rest and then pupate. Only adult males fly.


The Medawar 1959 Reith Lectures, ‘The Future of Man’

Soon after I had started ‘A’ levels at school in 1959, the two of us doing zoology were joined at the door of biology block by Jim Key (James John Key 1917-1976) the senior biology master. He had been arguing with Stan Revill (1907-1993), senior history master, and was keen to test his line for further sparring in the staff room. They had both listened to the BBC’s Reith Lectures by P.B. Medawar entitled The Future of Man. That was, of course, before Medawar had become Sir Peter and had been awarded the Nobel Prize. The staff room argument was about whether natural selection in Man, was over (Stan Revill’s stance) or not (Jim Key’s).


Fast forward from 1959 to 2024, I realised that I had never heard these lectures and thus found the one available on the BBC website (here). I also found a copy of the book Medawar published immediately after the lecture series. I think, having read virtually all of Medawar’s later books and having written on his insights in endocrinology, my expectations were too high since I was disappointed both by the lecture (the sixth of the six broadcast on 20 December 1959) and by the book. Was I judging with the benefit of knowledge gained over the past 65 years? Or were his choice of topics,  analogies and explanations not really that good? I strongly suspect that even for his audience on the Third Programme on a Sunday evening, his presentations would have gone over the heads of most.






At the same time as reading Medawar of 1959, I have been reading Venki Ramakrishnan’s Why We Die of 2024. I found myself agreeing with his views on Medawar’s later works:


Unlike many scientists who focus narrowly on one area, Medawar, like Haldane, had widespread interests, and wrote books that were famous for their erudition and elegant writing. Many scientists of my generation grew up reading his Advice to a Young Scientist (1981), which I found pompous, arrogant, thoughtful, engaging, and witty all at once.

The Future of Man can perhaps be described as a series of early essays, in the way of early works by an artist. The best was yet to come. There were though patches of where he put his message over extremely well, as on the genetic consequences of ‘social habit or act of legislation’ and of assortative mating. The book of the lectures is historically important because it deals with topics of human biological and cultural evolution that were being talked about by those in Medawar’s circle in the 1950s. I was therefore surprised to see that my cheap copy was one which had been withdrawn from a British university library. Do such institutions now just throw away important books by important authors away? I fear we are already depriving students the pleasures of browsing in a proper library and then wondering why they are bright but not learned.


…and can you imagine a publisher or the BBC producing anything with that title, or including the word ‘eugenics’ in the text, in 2024?


Medawar PB. 1959. The Future of Man. London: Methuen.